So I'm FINALLY going back through and revising all of my mountain and route pages to make the formats more complete, standardized, and up-to-date, especially since the potentials and standards of SPv2 are much different than in SPv1.
In SPv1 people were much more 'stingy' about submitting excessive mountain pages when there were two close summits with little prominence, and in the Wasatch what was done was we lumped the peaks into one mountain page.
Of course this creates a problem for searching, stats, etc., which makes it tempting to split the pages. However, the mountain pages would be virtually identical.
What do people think about this? One page I was thinking of splitting is this one:
http://www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock ... arora.html