splattski wrote:I think the most summit log signatures of my page submissions is a big 3. Although it might indicate a lack of page quality of my submissions, I choose to think of the low sign-ins as a badge of honor: I'm finding peaks that no one else visits.

Bob Sihler wrote:As a new member, I signed a lot of logs. But then I stopped seeing the point (and feel that way in the real mountains, too). Now, I usually don't sign unless I have something to report about the route conditions. I don't even sign the logs for my own pages: it ought to be obvious from the page that I was there!

lcarreaui wrote:That's the same way I feel when I climb little bumps in Arizona.

tazz wrote:But this is what he wrote...

"According to the climbers log, I'm the only one from SP to sign in. Surely others have been up this neat peak? No?"

Then the thread turned to voters points. I think he was wondering why such a busy peak gets little to no climbers/hikers log on SP.


Now he may have been dishonest (posting a thread in the forums gets more viewing and votes, nothing new) about his question. Not sure. But, His question was NOT about how many votes he is getting.

So my reply to his actual question is what i wrote and ... Unless you are a serious peak bragger, the only reason to post on the logs is to make a resume and prove what you have done to others. IMO. Some may use it as personal tick list but most i know keep That off line.