by surgent » Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:05 pm
by MoapaPk » Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:09 pm
by MoapaPk » Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:53 pm
by Buz Groshong » Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:29 pm
surgent wrote:I wonder if any of the ranges or peaks in Virginia grew a little after their earthquake...
You pose a good question. You'd need some sort of subduction-type fault nearby. Perhaps some of the peaks in the Cascadia region are inching upward due to the big fault off the coast of WA/BC/AK.
by Marmaduke » Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:42 am
by MoapaPk » Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:55 pm
Marmaduke wrote:Whitney was always listed at 14,997 feet and it has been listed at 14,505 (for some time now), Is this possibly the same thing or was Whitney's elevation adjusted because of better accuracy with new technology? Were Muir, Mallory and Russell found to have "new" elevations as well?
by H2SO4 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:37 am
by lcarreau » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:07 am
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 0 guests