Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

To fly or not to fly...

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.

To fly or not to fly...

Postby Denjem » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:42 pm

So there is air sevice from San Diego to Mammoth/ Yosemite airport now. After some research I found out that a flight is $179 round trip per person. To me this is a sh#t load of money. I can drive there and back for less that that. I can take a trip that doesn't total that much. So needless to say, I am not for it. This is mostly due to the cost. I would love to fly there and back all the time, but then I would have no car to get to trailheads or place to stash gear that didn't make the game time cut. What are the people's thoughts on this matter?
User Avatar
Denjem

 
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: San Diego, California, United States
Thanked: 12 times in 10 posts

The following user would like to thank Denjem for this post
repelmen

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby Clark_Griswold » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:49 pm

Flights like that are for wealthy people who don't want to use 12 hours to drive that back and forth. If it isn't worth the money for the extra time on the slopes or at the vacation house in Mammoth, then drive it. If you make a $100,000+ a year, or whatever, and would rather spend the money to fly and not drive, then it's worth it. It might be neat to do once with a window seat for the view. You have to have great Sierra views from the low cruising altitude.
...
User Avatar
Clark_Griswold

 
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:51 am
Location: The fat Cottonwod, New Mexico, United States
Thanked: 258 times in 200 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby Marmaduke » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:16 pm

My thought was mentioned by Lionel, I would fly one time. The views are incredible, especially when the peaks are loaded with snow. I flew into Vegas in April and the Sierra was an awesome sight. But if you get overcast skies, well then you just wasted some $$$$.
User Avatar
Marmaduke

 
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:08 am
Location: Sonoma, California, United States
Thanked: 441 times in 344 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby DukeJH » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:50 pm

Drive. More money for better gear. And who doesn't like crashing in the car at the trailhead?
User Avatar
DukeJH

 
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 11:12 am
Location: Huntington Beach, California, United States
Thanked: 20 times in 16 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby Denjem » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:59 pm

Perhaps I need to think about it like this, if I take a day or two off work and drive I have just lost out on wages for the day. (If you don't have vacation time)
User Avatar
Denjem

 
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: San Diego, California, United States
Thanked: 12 times in 10 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby MoapaPk » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:11 am

There are rental cars at the Mammoth airport. I flew there in 1987 (Albuquerque->LA->Mammoth), but it was paid for by the company, and I was there for 10 days. My main memories are 1) the plane was leaking oil out of one motor, I told the pilot, and he told me not to worry; 2) there was no bathroom and it was a rather long, bumpy flight...

EDIT: the regular service now uses Bombardier Q400 planes, much larger with a lavatory.
Last edited by MoapaPk on Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7290
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Thanked: 623 times in 404 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby Clark_Griswold » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:44 am

DukeJH wrote:Drive. More money for better gear. And who doesn't like crashing in the car at the trailhead?

Haha. Pretty much anyone over 25, or certainly 30.

I did look at your age.
...
User Avatar
Clark_Griswold

 
Posts: 1660
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:51 am
Location: The fat Cottonwod, New Mexico, United States
Thanked: 258 times in 200 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby lcarreau » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:27 am

Da Plane Boss .... da PLANE !!!

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 3884
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 570 times in 432 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby lcarreau » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:51 am

Who doesn't like snakes ???

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 3884
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 570 times in 432 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby lcarreau » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:03 am

Image
User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 3884
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 570 times in 432 posts

The following user would like to thank lcarreau for this post
mrchad9

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby Palisades79 » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:23 pm

I've flown to Mammoth,Bishop ,and Independence on 4-place planes from Sacramento for back-country ski ,climbing,and backpacking trips and the views were grand.We rented the planes and found a pilot who wanted the flight-hours. We all split the costs.Plan a trip with partners and put a notice up at Flight Clubs in your area . We taxied and hitchhiked to trailheads .
Palisades79

 
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: sacramento, California, United States
Thanked: 16 times in 14 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby edl » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:04 pm

Denjem wrote:So there is air sevice from San Diego to Mammoth/ Yosemite airport now. After some research I found out that a flight is $179 round trip per person. To me this is a sh#t load of money. I can drive there and back for less that that.


Are you really sure it costs less than that to drive? Google maps tells me it's about 800 miles one way, or 1600 round trip. If your car got 30 mph, at $3.50 (I wish) a gallon that's $180 bucks right there , but add in wear and tear on your vehicle, I would suspect it's costing way you more than you think. For our company, our reimbursement rate for personal vehicle use is around 40 cents per mile. That comes out to over $600 for a trip of this length. Granted, that's probably pretty high, but you start thinking about future transmission jobs and fuel pump replacements, and suddenly driving costs start to skyrocket. If you are dividing up the costs with a couple of friends, maybe you can make it work, but for a solo trip, I would bet you're way better off flying.

Plus, you are about 1000 times safer in a plane than in a car. Factor in the cost of one ER room visit, and flying doesn't look so bad.
edl

 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:34 pm
Location: Idaho Falls, U.S State, Country
Thanked: 6 times in 6 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby kylenicolls » Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:53 am

edI look again. I5 in CA is not 800 miles long, lol. I only know cause last time I crossed the CA/OR border I remember milepost 789 not far south of the pass. You got mixed up with round trip or something. San Diego to Yosemite is about 430 miles from what I just looked at. Hefty tag, no doubt...

If it were me, I'd probably drive. 179 is flight only. Especially if there was a bonus individual to split costs.
User Avatar
kylenicolls

 
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:15 am
Location: Corvallis, Oregon, United States
Thanked: 3 times in 3 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby lcarreau » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:06 am

But it's my turn to drive ..

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 3884
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 570 times in 432 posts

Re: To fly or not to fly...

Postby JHH60 » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:47 pm

I was just starting to plan a trip from the Bay Area to the east side (LVC and the boulders are calling :) ) and noticed that United now offers daily round trip flights from SFO to Mammoth for $132. Although I like having my trusty Subaru in any snow, that 6+ hr drive each way is not a great way to spend time off from work, and 600+ round trip miles on the car equates to $300+ if you use the usual numbers for gas+wear&tear + depreciation. Has anyone here tried flying United from SFO to Mammoth and renting a car, and are there pitfalls like frequent flight cancellations at Mammoth, or availability of decent rental cars (4WD/AWD is nice) there, or other problems, that I'm not thinking of? I fly enough that I don't have to pay extra for checked luggage on United, so that's not an issue.
User Avatar
JHH60

 
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:59 pm
Location: Belmont, California, United States
Thanked: 69 times in 57 posts

Next

Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.