by Dan Shorb » Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:17 am
by Noondueler » Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:17 am
by Gangolf Haub » Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:36 pm
by Baarb » Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:10 pm
by Scott » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:26 pm
by eekthebeak » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:54 am
by Dan Shorb » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:02 am
Gangolf Haub wrote:Found this link:
http://batikova.webovastranka.cz/image/ ... 41_433.jpg
No name, though
Looks a bit like this, though there is much less greenery there
by Baarb » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:34 am
by Gangolf Haub » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:03 am
Baarb wrote:There are some subtle differences between them that make me think that Gangolf's suggestion isn't the right one, even when considering view distance and angle. Kyrgyz mountain?: left peak has a chute shape on near side, right peak has double apex, shallow dip between them and generally glaciated. Italian mountain: left peak does not have a chute shape on near side, right peak has single apex, deep dip between them and generally snow covered.
by Scott » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:08 pm
You're right that I'm wrong and Mount BBaker it is:
by Dan Shorb » Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:16 am
Scott wrote:You're right that I'm wrong and Mount BBaker it is:
It is certainly Mt Baker. Exact match.
The question is, since Kyrgyzstan has so many spectacular mountains, why use Mt. Baker instead?
To me, the mountains in Kyrgystan look awesome:
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=mou ... &form=QBIR
http://www.summitpost.org/object_list.p ... bject_name
Mt Baker is also awesome, but they could have used a local mountain just as easily. (Also, since the photo was from Mt Baker, it was almost certainly a stolen pic).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests