Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

Removing summit registers

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.

Removing summit registers

Postby Andinistaloco » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:27 am

I've been up a bunch of peaks lately that once had registers (that I can remember) and now don't. Is there a band of folks just taking them off peaks? If so, is it because it's not natural, or it's litter, or what? I'll admit to kind of digging summit registers... fun to read and sign and whatnot. Though I'm interested in hearing why they're not OK, too.
User Avatar

Posts: 6331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:32 am
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona, The Great Southwest, United States
Thanked: 69 times in 43 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby Scott » Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:20 pm

That was before I realized that hundreds or thousands might sign the same register in the same year. So I lost my interest.

Those kinds of registers, I don't have have much interest in either.

I still sign registers for remote and/or difficult-to-attain peaks. For example, you'll see my name in the South Guardian Angel register.

I kind of like reading those too, especially on peaks that go years or decades between signatures. Sometimes you can read old registers from famous mountaineers. Such is the case of Elephant Butte in Arches NP, but since the peak has shown up on the internet and now in a guidebook, use has exploded (which I'm not complaining about; I contributed to this too) and the register isn't as cool as it once was.

I still like reading the old registers where years or decades go between ascents. There are lots of those registers in the area I live in.
User Avatar

Posts: 8109
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:03 pm
Location: Craig, Colorado, United States
Thanked: 1075 times in 557 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby MarkDidier » Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:04 pm

I don't seek out summit registers. I wish I could give a really good reason why, but I can't. The best I can say is that, I don't feel the need to sign them. There are certain peaks I wish to climb, and that is enough. If I make it to the summit, that's a bonus.

That being said, my name is on the register of many of the Colorado peaks I have summitted - signed by my friend Rob. On all of these summits I have been with my son Andrew or my friend Rob. My son likes to sign summit registers, and Rob LOVES summit registers and will spend a lot of time trying to locate them. He likes reading them and signing with a comment. He usually asks me if I want to sign the register, or he'll ask if he should sign my name for me. In both cases I usually say no -although I will admit that I told him to sign for me this year on a couple of peaks that I was particulalry proud of summiting.
User Avatar

Posts: 378
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:24 am
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
Thanked: 61 times in 46 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby Brian C » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:57 am

As mentioned above, the registers place of value is on obscure summits. Signing your name in a register that you know will be full and replaced in a month or two doesn't matter much. Signing your name a few pages after something like this...

That said, I have also noticed registers going MIA on places that I've seen them before in the last few years.
User Avatar
Brian C

Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States
Thanked: 20 times in 18 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby Deltaoperator17 » Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:02 am

We are having the same issue's in Idaho.
User Avatar

Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:23 am
Location: Middleton, Idaho, United States
Thanked: 19 times in 14 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby Andinistaloco » Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:17 pm

Bob Sihler wrote:
Deltaoperator17 wrote:We are having the same issue's in Idaho.

It's lousy to steal what others have made.

But still I ask: Why did it have to be there in the first place? And why did someone need to pile up some rocks atop the peak?

Many times, I have kicked apart cairns that had no business being there; they did not mark an important junction or mark a critical spot, so why were they there at all?

If you'll admit it's fun to read registers (or even occasionally sign them) - especially ones from like fifty-plus years ago - then no doubt you'll agree that SOMEONE had to put them there.

I never sign the one for Humphreys Peak, for example, or most of the other peaks that get climbed on a weekly or daily basis.

But on a fifth-class butte in Sedona (rare, I know) there's one that goes back to the 1950s and has only around a name a year, average. Some of the folks who've been up there I know, some I've just heard of or read of. None of that would be there if the guy who climbed it second took the register. Or really, if ANYONE in the last sixty years took the register. All it takes is one person to decide "that doesn't have to be there," and all that is gone.
User Avatar

Posts: 6331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:32 am
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona, The Great Southwest, United States
Thanked: 69 times in 43 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby Fred Spicker » Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:43 pm

Sometimes registers are removed and preserved - here is the site for the Tetons:

User Avatar
Fred Spicker

Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 5:47 am
Location: Spokane, Washington, United States
Thanked: 59 times in 37 posts

Re: Removing summit registers

Postby mrchad9 » Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:07 am

Bob Sihler wrote:it's fun to look through the old ones

Bob Sihler wrote:they don't enhance my experience

User Avatar

Posts: 4434
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1279 times in 874 posts


Return to General


  • Related topics
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.