Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

NPS vs. BLM

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
 

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby mrchad9 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:18 pm

This is my favorite warning sign in Yosemite. The current is stretching this poor fellow out as he approaches the waterfall's event horizon.

122-2274_IMG.JPG
spaghetti man
122-2274_IMG.JPG (951.25 KiB) Viewed 6453 times
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4434
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1279 times in 874 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby chugach mtn boy » Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:29 am

It's helpful when they point out the dangers along the way:

Image

But unfortunately, even the signs are not safe from the many perils of the wilderness:

Image
User Avatar
chugach mtn boy

 
Posts: 925
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 7:54 pm
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Thanked: 204 times in 121 posts

The following user would like to thank chugach mtn boy for this post
mrchad9

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby McCannster » Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:47 pm

BLM=dirtbag friendly. NPS, not so much.
User Avatar
McCannster

 
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 10:56 pm
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Thanked: 40 times in 27 posts

The following user would like to thank McCannster for this post
Daria

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby boyblue » Sun Dec 16, 2012 11:19 pm

Bob Burd wrote:The Bureau of Land Management, on the other hand, is known for almost none of these amenities. Hardly any fences or fees or even pavement for that matter, overseeing land that the NPS and most other Americans aren't interested in. You want to kill yourself on BLM land? Go right ahead


You mean we have to use common sense?! We're DUH... DUH... DOOMED! :shock:
User Avatar
boyblue

 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Newark, California, United States
Thanked: 99 times in 60 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby Buz Groshong » Thu Dec 20, 2012 3:07 pm

MoapaPk wrote:There is a great sign near Maroon Bells, shows a guy with crampons and ice tools climbing rock.

I love all the warning signs near the Grand Canyon, advising the dangers of hiking down with inadequate water, and misjudging the requirements of hiking back uphill after descending to the river. We should have lawyers at the top of the canyon, helping people sue for not getting enough warnings. That's the American way -- dumb shit behavior followed by lawsuits.


Most of those who hike into the Grand Canyon are tourons who don't hike regularly; also many are idiots. To get a permit to camp in the canyon you are sent a video warning of the dangers, those who don't know as much as experienced campers only have the signs to warn them. The warning signs would be helpful except that those who should read them don't.

Most of those who suffer dehydration in the canyon are women - they don't drink water so they won't have to pee in public. If the park wanted to actually do something about the dangers, they would install latrines along the Bright Angel Trail.
User Avatar
Buz Groshong

 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Thanked: 687 times in 484 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby Brian C » Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:26 pm

Image

Don't think this would go over well on national park land. Haha.
User Avatar
Brian C

 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Longmont, Colorado, United States
Thanked: 20 times in 18 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby Buz Groshong » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:42 pm

Leaves me wondering if what I heard was a myth rather than fact. On the other hand statistics on people who have to get rescued because of dehydration might no be quite the same as for those who die from dehydration.
User Avatar
Buz Groshong

 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Thanked: 687 times in 484 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby mrchad9 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:48 pm

Unless I saw the data I wouldn't believe it. The NPS and its staff are not exactly purveyors of wisdom.

They've been telling me to take a water filter into the Sierra for years... I still haven't done it and have yet to find any reason why I should do so.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4434
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1279 times in 874 posts

Re: NPS vs. BLM

Postby Buz Groshong » Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:47 pm

Bob Sihler wrote:Buz would recognize this one; it's at Dark Hollow Falls in Shenandoah NP and cracks me up every time I see it:


I don't often hike the Dark Hollow Falls Trail - a bit too wimpy. :wink:

There are lots of kids on that trail and most of the parents need a more "in your face" warning than that.

Speaking of which, a woman who used to work with me told a story of hiking White Oak Canyon and seeing a kid playing over by one of the falls. She approached the parents, who were paying no attention to the child, and told them "you know it would really ruin the day for the rest of us if your child fell in and got killed." That got the parents' attention.
User Avatar
Buz Groshong

 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Thanked: 687 times in 484 posts

Next

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.