by colinr » Tue Jan 01, 2013 9:24 am
by lcarreau » Tue Jan 01, 2013 3:01 pm
by Bubba Suess » Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:17 pm
SeanReedy wrote:Pinnacles National Park is awaiting President Obama's signature:
by phydeux » Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:52 pm
by simonov » Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:52 pm
Bubba Suess wrote:The increase in stature, geographic diversity and ability to absorb visitors would be more comensurate with park status. As it is, it will remain a monument in all but name. It is a done deal though, since I doubt O would veto the bill. If you like climbing at pinnacles, get ready for crowds.
by lcarreau » Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:08 pm
by simonov » Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:44 pm
lcarreau wrote:Pets ARE allowed in the San Gorgonio, but must be kept under control at all times.
by lcarreau » Thu Jan 03, 2013 5:28 pm
simonov wrote:lcarreau wrote:Pets ARE allowed in the San Gorgonio, but must be kept under control at all times.
Yes, because it's still part of a National Forest, not a National Park.
by Bubba Suess » Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:01 pm
simonov wrote:My impression of the difference between National Forests and National Parks is there are a lot more regulations in the latter. For example, no dogs on trails in National Parks (at least here out west).
by phydeux » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:22 am
by colinr » Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:09 pm
by mrchad9 » Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:18 pm
by lcarreau » Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:33 am
So you want more than a minor alteration to the name?
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 0 guests