New USFS photography rules

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
User Avatar
Alpinist

 
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 7:21 pm
Thanked: 1083 times in 734 posts

New USFS photography rules

by Alpinist » Sat Sep 27, 2014 3:17 am

A warning for professional photographers. Starting in December, the USFS will require a permit for commercial photography in US Wilderness Areas.......at a cost of $1500!

Source.

The following user would like to thank Alpinist for this post
norco17

User Avatar
Wasatch Summits

 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:12 am
Thanked: 45 times in 31 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by Wasatch Summits » Sat Sep 27, 2014 4:16 am

Who gives a shit. I will take photos of this incredible scenery anywhere... Big brother was a bully then, this in now. It is hard for me to believe that anyone can regulate this other than commercialization. I just want to share the experience and route, that is all.

Phenom here on SP. Cory out there on the routes.

User Avatar
nartreb

 
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 10:45 pm
Thanked: 184 times in 155 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by nartreb » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:04 am

Ugh, where do these so-called reporters come up with this? You can read the draft rules for yourself right here:

https://www.federalregister.gov/article ... gister.gov

Short version:
1) There's very little new here. This is a renewal of an existing regulation, with additional clarification around motioin pictures. The statute has been in effect for a while

2) There is a very specific definition of "still photography" in 36 CFR 251.51:
Still photography—use of still photographic equipment on National Forest System lands that takes place at a location where members of the public generally are not allowed or where additional administrative costs are likely, or uses models, sets, or props that are not a part of the site's natural or cultural resources or administrative facilities.
In other words, taking a still camera on the trails is not affected by this regulation AT ALL, unless you're doing a fashion shoot on the trails.

3) Even if you're shooting video, you still don't need a permit unless the "primary purpose" of your trip is to sell something. In other words, this affects almost nobody.

4) The $1500 number is nowhere to be found in the proposed rule. Apparently a Forest Service spokesman mentioned this number at a press conference as a possible *maximum* fee, presumably for large film productions.

In practice, a small film crew gets charged about $30 a day. You won't find that info at the link above, though. In fact the pricing process is quite opaque. The regulations are designed for situations like cattle ranching or operating a ski resort, where you rent the land by the year. For a small film crew you shouldn't need a permit at all, see CFR 251.50(e)(1), though that's at the USFS discretion. It's a funny bureaucratic world we live in: "a special use authorization is not required" if they review your proposal and give their approval.

The only reason this is in the news is that there have been a few incidents where the USFS has insisted that folks apply for permits for activities that have historically been unregulated, like a public TV series shooting a documentary within a USFS lands. (The USFS took the position that this was commercial use since the TV station planned to offer DVDs for sale.) Those generally have ended in embarrassment for the USFS.

The USFS does seem to feel that regulations and permit applications are "necessary to allow the public to use the land" - see the preamble to the proposed rule. That's the sort of attitude that does nothing to quell the sort of alarmist reporting we're seeing with this story.

The following user would like to thank nartreb for this post
Bob Sihler, Buz Groshong, mountainhare

User Avatar
Alpinist

 
Posts: 6823
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 7:21 pm
Thanked: 1083 times in 734 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by Alpinist » Sat Sep 27, 2014 5:21 pm

Note that I addressed this to "professional photographers" and "commercial photography" in the OP. No need for an amateur photographer to get excited about this (unless you're contributing to this album).

The article states that there is a $1000 fine per photo though. So if you are a professional photographer, and there are some pros here on SP, you better be careful. A violation could quickly get expensive.

User Avatar
mountainhare

 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 2:40 am
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by mountainhare » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:12 pm

Is it called "click-bait" when someone posts a vague and/or misleading statement as a headline, in order to entice many views of the article? The premise seemed like a reach right from the start, but I clicked on it earlier in the week, so I am one of the enablers of this garbage.

Yahoo can post nonsense, but nartreb can undermine it with the truth. Good stuff.

User Avatar
phydeux

 
Posts: 1070
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 9:39 pm
Thanked: 783 times in 499 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by phydeux » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:15 pm

Alpinist wrote:A warning for professional photographers. Starting in December, the USFS will require a permit for commercial photography in US Wilderness Areas.......at a cost of $1500!

Source.


Dude, you got punked by Yahoo, and you're not making yourself look reliable by posting Yahoo "News" articles (always light on facts/heavy of speculation and sensationalisim).

Nartreb's psot pretty much explains the reality. Special use permits have been used for years for film shoots and photography shoots. They typically allow the group to use an area as long as they provide security, adhere to safety rules, clean up after they leave ('leave no trace'), and designate when they can shoot (usually midweek around So Cal, when the public traffic in the backcountry is sparse) . Lots of times they'll have equipment trailers, power generators, tents, etc. I've come across a western movie being filmed in the Holcomb Valley (San Bernardino Mtns/San Bernardino Natl Forest of Southern California; staff there wouldn't tell me what it was), and a swimsuit fashion shoot on the beach in Orange County (actually quite an extensive array of lighting, power equipment, tents, staff, etc). Nothing new in that article.

BTW: I wonder how much the pro photographer got fined for taking that photo of the Maroon Bells peaks in the article, or did Yahoo just rip the photo from some unsuspecting person's family digital photo album?

User Avatar
Buz Groshong

 
Posts: 2845
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:58 pm
Thanked: 687 times in 484 posts

Re: New USFS photography rules

by Buz Groshong » Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:17 pm

phydeux wrote:
Alpinist wrote:A warning for professional photographers. Starting in December, the USFS will require a permit for commercial photography in US Wilderness Areas.......at a cost of $1500!

Source.


Dude, you got punked by Yahoo, and you're not making yourself look reliable by posting Yahoo "News" articles (always light on facts/heavy of speculation and sensationalisim).

Nartreb's psot pretty much explains the reality. Special use permits have been used for years for film shoots and photography shoots. They typically allow the group to use an area as long as they provide security, adhere to safety rules, clean up after they leave ('leave no trace'), and designate when they can shoot (usually midweek around So Cal, when the public traffic in the backcountry is sparse) . Lots of times they'll have equipment trailers, power generators, tents, etc. I've come across a western movie being filmed in the Holcomb Valley (San Bernardino Mtns/San Bernardino Natl Forest of Southern California; staff there wouldn't tell me what it was), and a swimsuit fashion shoot on the beach in Orange County (actually quite an extensive array of lighting, power equipment, tents, staff, etc). Nothing new in that article.

BTW: I wonder how much the pro photographer got fined for taking that photo of the Maroon Bells peaks in the article, or did Yahoo just rip the photo from some unsuspecting person's family digital photo album?


But you gotta remember: If you want to sell the news you've got to be an alarmist! The truth is dull and boring. :wink:


Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests