-40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

Post climbing gear-related questions, offer advice. For classifieds, please use that forum.
User Avatar
SabyR

 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:53 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

-40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by SabyR » Mon Sep 29, 2014 5:46 pm

I am debating the purchase of a winter camping sleeping bag (the price is not an issue at all). I have a credit at TNF which can take care of the entire cost. Is going to a -40 a good insurance policy? The weight difference between the -40 and -20F is about 312 gr or 11 ounce, is this going to be a problem in my backpack over serval days of hiking? If the weather is below freezing but not quite -40, will the seeping back be way too hot and make me sweat my life? The bag is likely to be coupled with Expex DownMat 7 LW and some sort of liner which I have not selected.

I will be going mostly in the Whites and the Greens in NH and VT but within the next couple of years I may want to tackle Denali. Is this way overkill or I will be glad I bought it?

User Avatar
Jesus Malverde

 
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2001 1:17 pm
Thanked: 140 times in 90 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by Jesus Malverde » Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:38 pm

Sab,

You see these threads?:

sleeping-bad-for-white-mountains-t68304.html
0-degree-bag-or-20-degree-bag-t67425.html

The general consensus on the SP Gear forum seems to be that you don't even need a negative two dime bag for lower 48.
Hell, you sure don't need a -40 bag for Denali unless you plan on doing a winter attempt. -20 will serve you just fine for a West Buttress/Rib trip in the standard climbing season. But then, who the hell is gonna really listen to the patron saint of Sinoloan narcotraficantes? :)

That being said, have you considered using that TNF credit to pickup a nice down jacket or a negative two dime bag? What about an extra TNF expedition duffle to lug all that equipage to Anchorage? FWIW, If price is not an issue for a winter bag, I'd look at other manufacturers.

Stay warm,
JM

A final thought: I do sympathize with your dilemma. Years ago I stood in the Bend North Face outlet salivating over a -40 TNF Inferno bag that was 50% off. I just couldn't bring myself to spend more money on that road trip. Looking back I'm so glad I didn't buy it.

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3666
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 663 times in 496 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by ExcitableBoy » Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:38 am

I have a ~-20 Feathered Friends bag. It has been used exactly twice, once on Denali, once on Aconcagua. My other trips to the Alaska Range, Canada in Winter, Rainier in Winter, etc. I used a +15 degree bag. Super warm bags are just not that versatile. Better off getting a bag that is warm enough for what you will do most of the time and then wear extra clothes when it is colder.

User Avatar
hikerbrian

 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:32 pm
Thanked: 11 times in 5 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by hikerbrian » Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:42 pm

SabyR, get a -20 down bag from Western Mountaineering or Feathered Friends. Don't get a sleeping bag from TNF. You'll be buying another one in 2-3 yrs. A reputable/boutique -20 down bag will allow you to tackle things like a Presi-traverse and Baxter. It gets cold in the Whites in the winter regularly. I personally have had little luck wearing all of my clothes to bed in the winter. Just too uncomfortable.

User Avatar
BigMitch

 
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:17 pm
Thanked: 16 times in 16 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by BigMitch » Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:01 am

I agree with Hikerbrian, and for the first time ever, disagree with EB, only because my application was different than his.

Get the high quality -20F bag from WM or FF. Then, if you need something warmer, add a bivy sack and wear more clothes.

I first bought a -40F bag for northern MN in winter. It worked great, but it was bulky. I bought a -20f bag and never used the -40F bag again.

I sold my -40f to a guy in western North Dakota, who probably lived in a camper van in an oil field.

User Avatar
asmrz

 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2002 7:52 am
Thanked: 248 times in 157 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by asmrz » Thu Oct 02, 2014 5:18 pm

I still have my 25 years old Marmot Penguin -40 bag that I bought for my three Alaskan trips and two Nepal/Tibet trips. I think your choice depends on where you are likely to use the bag. I used the bag on Denali, but we were there in early May the first time and tried a new route the second time. The bag was way too warm for any camps bellow about 7,000 meters in Himalaya.

I have not used that bag anywhere else in the lower 48, nor in South America, nor ever since. My wife sleeps in it in winter when we drop bags by the car in the Sierra. I have no other use for it. At four pounds it is too heavy and too warm for me, even today.

My old -5 F Marmot did all the alpine work, all the other fall and early spring season trips in the mountains.

So the - 40 F bag might be useful for NE mid winter climbing and camping without a tent, but unless your plans include some other really cold places, I would go with lighter weight and less protection. If you REALLY anticipate mid winter trips in the NE , -20 bag and a good bivi sack should do.

Anything else, my take would be -10 F bag from Western Mountaineering that could be taken just about anywhere in winter if you stay in a tent.

If in doubt, less is better and lighter than the biggest and warmest. You will always have some down jacket and a pair of johns with you in the winter so if needed, you can increase the bag rating that way.

Also, a tent will increase you bag rating by about 10 degrees.

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3666
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 663 times in 496 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by ExcitableBoy » Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:51 pm

BigMitch wrote:I agree with Hikerbrian, and for the first time ever, disagree with EB, only because my application was different than his.

I wouldn't expect a Christmas card from me this year.

User Avatar
WyomingSummits

 
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:03 am
Thanked: 114 times in 87 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by WyomingSummits » Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:41 pm

I use a 20 degree bag with a down puffy in -20 and stay toasty. Things like this are very subjective....no one size fits all. But I agree that -40 in the lower 48 is mega overkill. For that matter, I recently carried a Marmot Nanowave 55 and paired it with a PrimaloftOne ultrlight puffy on a 32 degree night.....was a bit too warm but that will be my combo in the future for spring-fall lower 48 trips as that bag barely weighs over a pound and the puffy is 13 oz. I like the versatility as I'm going to carry the jacket anyway.

User Avatar
SabyR

 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:53 am
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by SabyR » Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:26 pm

Thank you very much for all your input, I now realize how much every pound have an impact and that warmer does not mean better, I ended up getting the minus 20F Inferno, since it is lifetime warrantied and that North Face warranty is IMHO second to none, I am not too worried about the bag lasting only a couple of years...

User Avatar
normankirk

 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:47 pm
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts

Re: -40 TNF Inferno bad idea???

by normankirk » Mon Mar 02, 2015 3:25 am

SabyR wrote:Thank you very much for all your input, I now realize how much every pound have an impact and that warmer does not mean better, I ended up getting the minus 20F Inferno, since it is lifetime warrantied and that North Face warranty is IMHO second to none, I am not too worried about the bag lasting only a couple of years...


Don't worry, IMHO your TNF bag will last far longer than that. Mine have! There is so much hype in the outdoor industry its pitiful!


Return to Gear

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests