by MarthaP » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:32 pm
by Bob Sihler » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:46 pm
by MarthaP » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:51 pm
by Mike Swiz » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:01 am
MarthaP wrote:Agreed on all points, you two.
I could see just an Ethics forum because that's a huge part of climbing/mountaineering/backcountry activities. Let it be just ethics and let it be moderated.
Or just let those discussions continue in General and they'll get the readership.
by Bob Burd » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:09 am
MarthaP wrote:Really, why DOES this forum exist?
by kheegster » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:15 am
by taxinvestor » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:28 am
MarthaP wrote:Soooooo, I say we just get rid of the durned thing. Anything unmoderated, regardless of topic, belongs in the skanky version of PnP. Post pics of Boobs galore there (and don't forget Gee DoubleYah as one of them) and I won't get involved in that boyhood slagheap.
This monster really needs to go before it gets more publicly stupid than it already is.
by Bob Burd » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:29 am
kheegster wrote:In principle this forum is a great idea, as a place where argument can happen over climbing ethics. Having said that I don't think 9-page flame wars over, say, Dean Potter climbing Delicate Arch or Steve House vs Russian-style alpinism occur often enough to justify an entire new forum...
by BeDrinkable » Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:32 am
Bob Burd wrote:As it stands right now the threads and discussions are mostly lame. So maybe I'll nuke it if the trend continues. Seemed like an interesting idea, so I figured, what's the harm? There are a lot of things the elves can/t change, but this one we can experiment with. I don't know how to make it invisible to the front page, we'll have to wait for Matt to take action on that. I'll send him a note.
by SpiderSavage » Sat Aug 22, 2009 1:17 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests