Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
 

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Bob Sihler » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:05 am

I think some are still not understanding clearly (or don't want to), so I'll try to be succinct and skip the explanations.

1. Basically, Additions and Corrections becomes an open section at the bottom of the page rather than being a link on the side.

2. No other section of the page is open to anyone an owner doesn't want it to be open to.

3. The page owner is under no obligation to incorporate the information into other sections.

4. Anyone, owner included, can add, edit, and delete in that section.


Why this? There seems to be a general consensus that people are not using and/or checking the Additions/Corrections in the current format. Many guests and new members may not even notice it. We are trying to make this more visible while preserving the integrity of the page creator's work.

I've been firmly against suggestions to wikify this site, but I have no issues with this new idea.
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)
User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8191
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Location: Driftwood, Texas, United States
Thanked: 2466 times in 1372 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Bob Sihler » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:40 am

Received the following in a PM. I have put in bold what I think are very good suggestions.

Thanks Bob. It sounds like it might be similar to what was proposed by moving the corrections section to the main page. I think it would be good for the page owner to be notified any time renditions are made. It might be good to make it an optional feature as well, and restrict things like emoticons or all images for that matter.
"Alcohol is like love. The first kiss is magic, the second is intimate, the third is routine. After that you take the girl's clothes off."

--Terry Lennox, The Long Goodbye (Raymond Chandler)
User Avatar
Bob Sihler
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8191
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 3:20 pm
Location: Driftwood, Texas, United States
Thanked: 2466 times in 1372 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby EastKing » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:50 am

Gimpilator,

No fear about people going into your page and completely altering your page. If that was ever got brought up I would be against that in a heartbeat.. Basically Bob wants to move the additions/corrections page onto the main page and the owner of the page control of the additions/ corrections section from what I am hearing correctly.
User Avatar
EastKing

 
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 7:12 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
Thanked: 19 times in 12 posts

Re: To Wiki or not to Wiki

Postby mrchad9 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:50 am

I agree Bob!
mrchad9 wrote:Also I think the section would be text and links only. No pics would be allowed. And the font could even be a size smaller than the page itself so it doesn't look like it is part of the main work
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4291
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1232 times in 837 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:02 am

Well you have a stylist here who could easily make it look different from the rest of the page. Font size difference could work... but I think we could do something a little nicer looking. :) Perhaps a very light blue or yellow background around that section. I've got other ideas too. But font size difference not only sound boring, but makes it harder to read for people with bad vision. Trust me, the method I'm suggesting would make it obvious that it's not part of the main text.
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, United States
Thanked: 939 times in 573 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Klenke » Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:41 am

Bring back SP v1! Long live SP version 1. I want my 650pixel wide image limit back! And the Power ranking system. I had so much Power back then lightning bolts were practically coming out of my finger tips as I uploaded crappy photo after crappy photo to zero applause.

...

If it is as Bob Sihler says it will be, I am okay with the wiki idea in a limited state. I am not at all for having a whole page a wiki-able.

To bastardize Mr. Kipling:
“Ye may kill for yourselves, and your mates, and your cubs as they need, and ye can;
But wiki not for pleasure of wiki'ing, and seven times never wiki an entire SP page!”
User Avatar
Klenke

 
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 4:14 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
Thanked: 12 times in 8 posts

The following user would like to thank Klenke for this post
Bob Sihler

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:46 am

Klenke wrote:I had so much Power back then lightning bolts were practically coming out of my finger tips


Just work at your art. Down the road when your older you will have so much power, you'll be just like this guy:

Image

Or should I say much older...
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, United States
Thanked: 939 times in 573 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:01 am

Bob Sihler wrote:Too bad we don't have a spot for featured quotes.


Agreed. This is would be even more fun than a wiki box. :)
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, United States
Thanked: 939 times in 573 posts

Re: To Wiki or not to Wiki

Postby Marcsoltan » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:57 am

mrchad9 wrote:I agree Bob!
mrchad9 wrote:Also I think the section would be text and links only. No pics would be allowed. And the font could even be a size smaller than the page itself so it doesn't look like it is part of the main work


Again, my question, since I keep getting ignored, is there going to be a mechanism by which the owner of the page is notified that something has been added??????????????????????????
User Avatar
Marcsoltan

 
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:36 am
Location: California, United States
Thanked: 85 times in 34 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby mrchad9 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:59 am

Add that suggestion to the comments in UserVoice Marc. Sounds like a nice idea but we don't know how much extra effort it is.

That said, I think it would be good to include and hope we have it.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4291
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1232 times in 837 posts

Re: Small section at the bottom of pages to be wiki?

Postby Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:07 am

Marc, if a wiki box was actually added, I'd say there is a 95% chance that notifications would go with it. Since a wiki box would be more effort to watch over, there is no sense in having information changed behind people's back if you know what I mean. So don't worry about the notifications deal. When new features come out, typically new features come in to help those new features shine. :wink:
User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Location: Lynnwood, Washington, United States
Thanked: 939 times in 573 posts

Previous

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.