by chugach mtn boy » Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:32 pm
by mrchad9 » Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:36 pm
by rgg » Tue Jan 29, 2013 3:42 pm
Bubba Suess wrote:All images are currently missing their text box and are automatically aligned left. I checked the edit section and they are still set up to align right or center when appropriate but on the main page, they all still align left.
Fred Spicker wrote:Not just images without text - on my pages all images are aligned left regardless of what they are intended to be.
Also, none have the text next to them as originally formatted - this results in a bunch of ugly empty white space.
For example see: http://www.summitpost.org/eiger/150228
chugach mtn boy wrote:Likewise on Chad's new Whitney-Bolam page, his formatting is broken:
mrchad9 wrote:Matt something happened overnight. Lost the borders around photos and the alignment as folks have mentioned.
Need to go back to yesterday's code!
by chugach mtn boy » Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:22 pm
rgg wrote:In response to all of the above: I had the same when I logged on today, but the solution is easy: clear the cache of your browser (yes, again)! As Josh explained earlier in this thread in response to Bubba, the CSS was changed, and apparently it's been changed again since then. I reckon it's probably not a bad idea to clear the cache frequently over the next days to be sure to have the most recent SummitPost styles.
by rgg » Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:49 pm
chugach mtn boy wrote:A limited cache-clearing (last 4 weeks only) got everything formatting correctly again for me. So thanks! Dumb question, though: for the readership generally (who do not clear their caches), how long till they start seeing the pages in correct format?
by chugach mtn boy » Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:35 pm
Montana Matt wrote:EVERYONE WHO IS SEEING PROBLEMS WITH THE ALIGNMENT OF IMAGES, HIT THE F5 BUTTON ON YOUR KEYBOARD
by Josh Lewis » Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:33 pm
by mrchad9 » Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:01 pm
Catamount wrote:mrchad9 wrote:That is a bigger inconvenience no?
Given that there are less than 1,000 views of this thread and many of those are repeat visitors, it would seem that many people are likely experiencing the formatting problems described above and have no idea why. I would think the goal would be a seamless transition even if it meant the site being down for a few hours.
by Josh Lewis » Tue Jan 29, 2013 10:34 pm
Catamount wrote:Wouldn't it be normal practice to take the site down during such a maintenance period?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests