Welcome to SP!  -
Areas & RangesMountains & RocksRoutesImagesArticlesTrip ReportsGearOtherPeoplePlans & PartnersWhat's NewForum

Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
 

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby SoCalHiker » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:41 pm

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.


:) thought the same :)

I guess everybody eventually bottoms out in the forums... I could not resist either... :wink:
User Avatar
SoCalHiker

 
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:12 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Thanked: 147 times in 88 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:31 pm

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric
User Avatar
EricChu

 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Thanked: 17 times in 9 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby lcarreau » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:44 pm

Used widespread on internet message boards, the conjunction of the two words: "post" and "count" was established to define what is postcount, as we know it.

a) Members with a postcount in access of 100, may have an avatar.

b) Five is a low postcount for someone who has been registered here for over a year.

Image
User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4056
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 920 times in 692 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby mrchad9 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:32 pm

EricChu wrote:
mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric

Eric- a bit of sarcasm there!

You and Marc are among those who make impressive contributions to the site, and seldom post in the forums, not often straying in here. You have 32 posts now, and he has 5. You increased your count by 10%, and him by a whopping 67% this week. It always creates a stir of excitement when longstanding members with nice pages make a rare appearance here!

(if you are not seeing when I am getting the post count from, read the fields to the left of the posts)

8)
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1216 times in 825 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby lcarreau » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:53 pm

Sorry, but I have one burning question. WHY are you folks taking "Postcounts" so seriously ???

Does anybody on this site give a RATASS about the numbers game? For crying out loud... just sayin'.

I'm going outside to make a snow angel. Geez.. I forgot; you need SNOW to make snow angels!

Image
User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4056
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Court of the Crimson King, Arizona, United States
Thanked: 920 times in 692 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby visentin » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:07 pm

SoCalHiker wrote:In general I would have to agree with you, but you yourself have over 900 posts since 2008... :wink:


:D
True ! But most of them links to new pages... Count the number of my interventions in threads directly intended to me ;)
User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Location: WrocBaw, France and, Poland
Thanked: 87 times in 58 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:36 pm

mrchad9 wrote:
EricChu wrote:
mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.
Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric

Eric- a bit of sarcasm there!

You and Marc are among those who make impressive contributions to the site, and seldom post in the forums, not often straying in here. You have 32 posts now, and he has 5. You increased your count by 10%, and him by a whopping 67% this week. It always creates a stir of excitement when longstanding members with nice pages make a rare appearance here!

(if you are not seeing when I am getting the post count from, read the fields to the left of the posts)

8)
Oh, I see...well, I'm relieved...Cheers!
User Avatar
EricChu

 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Thanked: 17 times in 9 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby EricChu » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:38 pm

lcarreau wrote:Sorry, but I have one burning question. WHY are you folks taking "Postcounts" so seriously ???

Does anybody on this site give a RATASS about the numbers game? For crying out loud... just sayin'.

I'm going outside to make a snow angel. Geez.. I forgot; you need SNOW to make snow angels!

Image
You're right Larry - snow angels are a quite more worthwhile thing than numbers racing hehehe! :-)
User Avatar
EricChu

 
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:28 pm
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Thanked: 17 times in 9 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby Husker » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:02 am

lcarreau wrote:
EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?

Cheers,
Eric


I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.

HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

Image


The one on the left is fat! I'll take the one in the middle.
Husker

 
Thanked: time in post

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby mrchad9 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:22 am

Husker wrote:
lcarreau wrote:
EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?

Cheers,
Eric


I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.

HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

Image


The one on the left is fat! I'll take the one in the middle.

I like the way the shirt of the brunette pulls out from her abs. I'll take the one on the right.
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1216 times in 825 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby visentin » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:51 am

lcarreau wrote:HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

My eyesight tells me #3 ;)
User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Location: WrocBaw, France and, Poland
Thanked: 87 times in 58 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby Marmaduke » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:29 am

Number 1, the one on the left.............she has some frick'in' nostrils. I'll take 2 AND 3 please.
User Avatar
Marmaduke

 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:08 am
Location: Sonoma, California, United States
Thanked: 586 times in 451 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby mrchad9 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:30 am

LOL she looks like a pig!
User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Location: San Ramon, California, United States
Thanked: 1216 times in 825 posts

Re: Time for Bob Shiler to go away.

Postby Charles » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:35 am

truchas wrote:The one on the left is fugly. I'll take the one in the middle.

Well I hope Husker there there first.
User Avatar
Charles

 
Posts: 14936
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:20 am
Location: Germany
Thanked: 808 times in 598 posts

Previous

Return to Site Feedback

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

© 2006-2013 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.