SummitPost.org

EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.

thought the same

I guess everybody eventually bottoms out in the forums... I could not resist either...

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.

Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric

Used widespread on internet message boards, the conjunction of the two words: "post" and "count" was established to define what is postcount, as we know it.

a) Members with a postcount in access of 100, may have an avatar.

b) Five is a low postcount for someone who has been registered here for over a year.

EricChu wrote:

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.

Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric

Eric- a bit of sarcasm there!

You and Marc are among those who make impressive contributions to the site, and seldom post in the forums, not often straying in here. You have 32 posts now, and he has 5. You increased your count by 10%, and him by a whopping 67% this week. It always creates a stir of excitement when longstanding members with nice pages make a rare appearance here!

(if you are not seeing when I am getting the post count from, read the fields to the left of the posts)

Sorry, but I have one burning question. WHY are you folks taking "Postcounts" so seriously ???

Does anybody on this site give a RATASS about the numbers game? For crying out loud... just sayin'.

I'm going outside to make a snow angel. Geez.. I forgot; you need SNOW to make snow angels!

SoCalHiker wrote:In general I would have to agree with you, but you yourself have over 900 posts since 2008...

True ! But most of them links to new pages... Count the number of my interventions in threads directly intended to me

mrchad9 wrote:

EricChu wrote:

mrchad9 wrote:EricChu and Marcsoltan are doing a lot of damage to their post count this week.

Uhmm...could you explain this please? What exactly do you mean by "post count"? And what puzzles me most of all: just why do you say Marc is damaging his post count? I can't possibly see what he has done wrong! Cheers, Eric

Eric- a bit of sarcasm there!

You and Marc are among those who make impressive contributions to the site, and seldom post in the forums, not often straying in here. You have 32 posts now, and he has 5. You increased your count by 10%, and him by a whopping 67% this week. It always creates a stir of excitement when longstanding members with nice pages make a rare appearance here!

(if you are not seeing when I am getting the post count from, read the fields to the left of the posts)

Oh, I see...well, I'm relieved...Cheers!

lcarreau wrote:Sorry, but I have one burning question. WHY are you folks taking "Postcounts" so seriously ???

Does anybody on this site give a RATASS about the numbers game? For crying out loud... just sayin'.

I'm going outside to make a snow angel. Geez.. I forgot; you need SNOW to make snow angels!

You're right Larry - snow angels are a quite more worthwhile thing than numbers racing hehehe!

lcarreau wrote:

EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?

Cheers,
Eric

I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.

HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

The one on the left is fat! I'll take the one in the middle.

Husker wrote:

lcarreau wrote:

EricChu wrote: According to his profile, it's Sihler, not Shiler...or am I suffering of bad eye sight?

Cheers,
Eric

I can't speak for the OP, but I believe the "misspelling" was intentional.

HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

The one on the left is fat! I'll take the one in the middle.

I like the way the shirt of the brunette pulls out from her abs. I'll take the one on the right.

lcarreau wrote:HEY Eric #2 ??? HOW is your eyesight NOW ???

My eyesight tells me #3

Number 1, the one on the left.............she has some frick'in' nostrils. I'll take 2 AND 3 please.

LOL she looks like a pig!

truchas wrote:The one on the left is fugly. I'll take the one in the middle.

Well I hope Husker there there first.