by Strider » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:56 pm
by ADKMan » Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:33 am
by Strider » Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:39 pm
Andes6000 wrote:Go with arcteryx, you get what you pay for. Or lowe alpine, well designed and light.
by ZeroFC » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:28 am
by logsden » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:39 pm
Yes those are good but the problem is i dont have them around. only the mammut dealership.
by butitsadryheat » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:16 pm
by luzak00 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:20 am
by WyomingSummits » Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:54 am
by Wastral » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:54 am
WyomingSummits wrote:Ultimately, even with as much of a gear nut as I am, one has to conclude that we're largely hyper-analyzing these things. Peaks were bagged LONG before these modern features were introduced. If it's light, durable, comfortable, and gets your stuff to the top....it's a mountaineering bag!
by jo83ben » Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:28 am
by pvnisher » Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:34 am
by StukeSowle » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:29 pm
jo83ben wrote:Check out the Alchemist 40L by first ascent. It has most of the features you wanted, including the bivy pad, crampon attachment (external though), tool attachments, removable hip belt etc. It weighs in at 4lbs with the bivy pad, and is hydration compatible, plus it has a lifetime warranty. Not sure about the haul loops though, but I think it could be rigged up to haul. Also, its 40L, but it easily extends to 55L.
by Strider » Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:46 pm
pvnisher wrote:I have and love the Mammut Trion Light. Doesn't do the bivy pad deal or crampon pocket. But I just wrap my crampons in my gaiters. And I don't plan on frequently using the panel as a bivy, if needed can use the rope and rest of pack as a pad/seat.
2.25 lbs in full mode, stripped down to 1.5 lbs (without waterproof liner, lid, or hipbelt).
Users browsing this forum: bserk and 0 guests