by Sarah Simon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:55 pm
by mrchad9 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:57 pm
by Kiefer » Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:00 pm
by Sarah Simon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:43 pm
Kiefer Thomas wrote:Damn it, Sarah! What are you doing?
You're SUPPOSE to be enjoying yourself, enjoying the 70 degree temps, frolicking barefoot through the pecan orchards, smelling the blooms o' the cacti (carefully!!) and drinking margs!
Get off your laptop and go get a hellacious tan! BTW, could ya pick me up a bottle of Kaluha if you happen to head down Nogales way? I used to go all the time from Tubac.
by Buz Groshong » Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:44 pm
mrchad9 wrote:If rather see a method to stop pages with attachments from being deleted altogether. Force the owner to remove their text and leave it at that. I'll probably add that to user voice later today.
by mrchad9 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:02 pm
by Sarah Simon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:25 pm
mrchad9 wrote:Ok. I added the idea to UserVoice.
by Bob Sihler » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:48 pm
by mrchad9 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:59 pm
by Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:14 am
by Bob Sihler » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:06 am
mrchad9 wrote:Then vote on it Bob!
And agreed we aren't talking about deleting photos. We are talking about mountain, area, canyon, and route pages.
by Bob Sihler » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:09 am
Josh Lewis wrote:Personally I would rather the system be created to lock a page from being deleted once someone signs the climber log. If the method above was created, custom objects could not be deleted. And if they could... that means it could easily be tampered with by swapping the object type from mountain to custom object.
by Josh Lewis » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:19 am
by mrchad9 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:38 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests