by yatsek » Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:39 am
by Josh Lewis » Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:15 am
by yatsek » Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:04 pm
Josh Lewis wrote:Images hosted from outside SP are okay but preferably to credit the author unless your the owner (I've done this at least once).
Josh Lewis wrote:Who wants to see a stolen page (info that they took with zero credits and possibly copyright) as one of the top rated of the week? Not me.
by Bob Sihler » Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:11 pm
yatsek wrote:SP is unique in that its rock/mtn/area/route pages are supposed to provide both good info and illustrative photos embedded in the text. What if most of the images featured on an SP page come from outside of SP, e.g. from Wikipedia? Should such a page not be thought of as a poor page, especially if there's little firsthand beta? Does it deserve a 10/10 or rather less than 6/10? (Over 70% of the votes cast on one recently posted page like that are 10s.)
by Scott » Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:26 pm
Should such a page not be thought of as a poor page
by Josh Lewis » Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:07 pm
[url=http://www.summitpost.org/phpBB3/both-beta-and-photos-t66051.html#]Both beta and photos[/url]
by Bob Sihler » Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:23 pm
by lcarreau » Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:57 pm
Bob Sihler wrote:
People vote mindlessly ...
Check out the votes on this picture, which I can say with 99% certainty is not the SP member's: http://www.summitpost.org/psychofatboy/863841.
Josh Lewis wrote:
Oh c'mon Bob, you don't like Burchey's photo of the day? Look at how well crafted that bird is flying with white glitter around it.
by yatsek » Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:26 pm
Bob Sihler wrote:This is part of why I do very little voting anymore. It's not just that people vote 10 too often on pages that don't deserve it; it's that many people seem unable to discern quality and authenticity. Or they are unconcerned about even trying.
by Scott » Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:44 pm
You guys are WAY too trigger-happy. All of you.
by yatsek » Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:20 am
Josh Lewis wrote:For a while now I've admired your willingness to break out of the conformity of SP voting habits. (...) Voting honestly enables the voting system to do it's intended job which is to sort content.
by Josh Lewis » Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:51 pm
by yatsek » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:46 am
Josh Lewis wrote:Feel free to blow the whistle to us if you need bad votes removed. Revenge down votes are not taken kindly in these parts. It's rare, but I've seen revenge votes in the past. Hopefully they don't have much power behind them.
by Josh Lewis » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:32 pm
Users browsing this forum: bscott and 0 guests