by chicagotransplant » Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:40 pm
by Arthur Digbee » Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:51 pm
by chicagotransplant » Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:32 pm
Arthur Digbee wrote:Well, chicagotransplant, probably all the cairns are on the right-hand side of the ridge.
But in all seriousness, I really love that picture of a designated wilderness boundary.
by chicagotransplant » Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:50 am
by ksolem » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:11 am
jhodlof wrote: ...One thing is for sure. It's a place that chainsaws and fire fighting is legally allowed, but mountain bikes and bolts are forbidden.
by lcarreau » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:39 am
Arthur Digbee wrote:And in New York you might be more than a day away from medical care if you get hurt.
by Guyzo » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:05 pm
by Guyzo » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:08 pm
Dingus Milktoast wrote:I don't think 'fraud' when I see a designated wilderness area, Guy.
I think... "DAMN I AM A LUCKY BASTARD TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT IS SO SMART AS TO TRY TO PRESERVE THESE LANDS. AND I GET TO WALK AND CLIMB THERE TOO!!!111111"
What an incredible legacy!
Its great! No, probably not 'true' wilderness but as close as I am likely to get any time soon.
by chicagotransplant » Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:58 pm
MikeTX wrote:I'd rather places be restricted to a few roads only accessible by FS employees than left open for developers to litter the area with shopping malls and condos.
Users browsing this forum: TimmyC and 0 guests