Welcome to SP!  -

Pico de Orizaba Additions and Corrections

[ Post an Addition or Correction ]
Viewing: 1-5 of 5    

ScottRe: Altitude correction


Voted 10/10

If you are interested:

No matter where you are, guides will probably usually use the highest elevation available.

Anyway, it is 100% certain that Orizaba is around 18,400-18,500 feet rather than 18,700 feet as some older sources state. SRTM data confirms this and 18,700 is for sure an error. The latest Mexican topographic survey puts the peak at 18,409, close to the height listed on this mountain page. SRTM, topographic surveys, and the figure posted on the mountain page are all fairly close.
Posted Aug 22, 2007 2:35 pm

CoraxRe: Altitude correction


Hasn't voted

Posted Aug 22, 2007 3:35 pm

CurtissimoRe: Altitude correction


Hasn't voted

5610 meters (18,406') is the number now officially issued by the Mexican government (INEGI) as well as Secor and the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Wikipedia uses 5636 M (18,491').

Posted Oct 30, 2009 6:48 pm

AlpineFunRe the Joaquin hostel

Hasn't voted

A quick review of Joaquin Canchola Limon hostel - aka the Cancholas Family Hostel - having stayed there with a group. The pros: the people are friendly, they make their livelihood off the service and know the logistics well and drive you up to the basecamp hut, and you can leave stuff at the hostel while you go up to Orizaba.

The cons: The beds in the hostel are very uncomfortable (we put our camping pads on top of the so-called mattresses and it was still quite uncomfortable), the food was mediocre at best, you are sharing 3 shower/bathrooms with potentially a lot of people, and the prices are outrageously high. Yes it's a hostel so these conditions are to be expected, but the prices do not reflect that. If you break up the costs to separate out food and transportation, it's still $50+/night per person, with 3 or more people in a room -- i.e., $150+/night for a somewhat dirty room with no amenities.

If you don't want to think about the logistics and don't mind spending a lot of money for it, then it's not a terrible option. But know that it's ridiculously overpriced for what it is.
Posted Jan 31, 2016 7:30 pm

jklloyd81Update: Crevasse Danger

Hasn't voted

February 8, 2016 on the standard Jamapa Glacier route:

I was making a solo ascent of the peak, convinced that crevasse danger was minimal from all I had read online. I broke through the surface of the glacier at 18100', fell 8 meters to the crevasse floor, and spent the next 24 hours trying to get out of a 3 meter wide crevasse. I was eventually rescued. I feel compelled to advise climbers that this mountain is changing. Large crevasses do exist. One nearly took my life. I will return to Orizaba, but only as part of a roped team. In the spirit of common sense, I invite others to do the same.
Posted Feb 16, 2016 2:58 pm

Viewing: 1-5 of 5    
[ Return to 'Pico de Orizaba' main page ]