Welcome to SP!  -
The page was successfully edited.

100 Years on the Timpanogos Glacier

100 Years on the Timpanogos Glacier

  Featured on the Front Page
100 Years on the Timpanogos Glacier

Page Type: Article

Object Title: 100 Years on the Timpanogos Glacier


Page By: Scott, Sam Dunford

Created/Edited: Apr 5, 2006 / Feb 9, 2016

Object ID: 186144

Hits: 27085 

Page Score: 96.11%  - 57 Votes 

Vote: Log in to vote



The "glacier" is somewhat of an unusual and interesting feature for Utah. A perhaps little known fact is that the glacier reportedly used to have some distinct (by Rockies standards) and visible crevasses before the "Dust Bowl Drought" of the 1930's*. Some of the old photos are available at BYU or in Kelsey's book on Timpanogos, and one is posted in the section below.

Although the feature has been referred to as a glacier (sometimes affectionately) for many years, the status of the glacier/snowfield/icefield had been debated for just as long.

*(Other than the 1994 crevasse that opened up in the center of the talus bulge on the Timpanogos Glacier, the latest actual first hand report I can find reporting any crevasses is from 1916. If you know of any first hand reports of actual witnesses after this date, please let me know. Some second hand accounts [1908, 1912, and 1916] claim that there were occasional small crevasses until the Dust Bowl Drought).

After the 1930's drought, much of the glacier/surface snow melted and has never recovered. As far as I know, no crevasses were ever mentioned between the dust bowl drought and 1994. Also after the Dust Bowl Drought, the glacier was thought to be more of a perpetual snowfield over a rock glacier until the surface snow completely (or almost completely) melted for the first time in the drought of 1994. During that year a large crevasse opened up in the talus, revealing glacial ice below. For now it appears the glacier survives and is protected under the talus. The surface snow and ice also completely melted (or at least almost completely melted) in 2003.

The Timpanogos Glacier in 1905

The winter of 1904 to 1905 was one of the least snowy years ever recorded in the Wasatch. It was the driest November (zero precipitation in most of the Wasatch) and one of the driest Decembers on record. January and February snowfall was way below normal. Only March had slightly above normal precipitation. Snow fall in Salt Lake City was less than 41% of normal for the season.

Notice that much of the surface snow has melted, which was unusual for the time period. Also notice the hanging ice on the north face.

Timpanogos in1909
A late September photo of the Timp Glacier during an extreme drought year in 1905. USGS Photo.

The Timpanogos Glacier in 1907

This is the Timpanogos Glacier as it appeared in 1907 (normal snow year). Notice the crevasse in the photo. One trip report from 1912 makes the statement that the glacier had “a series of beautiful crevasses” to pass on route to the summit.

1907 Photo
Timpanogos Glacier as it appears in August 1907. BYU Photo archives; photographer unknown.

The Timpanogos Glacier in 1949

The Dust Bowl Drought of the 1930’s took a heavy toll on the Timpanogos Glacier, and much of the surface ice melted. The worst year of all was 1934, and the glacier shrunk drastically in just that one year. In most years, not many crevasses opened up after the 1930’s, and they were all small. The glacier took on the appearance of a perpetual snowfield, more than a true glacier.

The 1940’s provided a welcome relief from the drought and average or above average precipitation returned for several years. During the 1940’s several mid summer ski races were held, usually in late July. Once crevasse was reported in July of 1946. Whether this was a true crevasse is not known.

July 30, 1949 Photo
A July 30, 1949 (a very heavy snow year) photo of the Timpanogos Glacier. During the 1940's, ski races were held on the glacier; Ray Stewart Photo

The Timpanogos "Glacier" in the 1950's-1980's

During the 1950’s, 1960’s and 1970’s, with alternating dry and wet years, the “glacier” waxed and waned, but always had the appearance of a perpetual snowfield. The early to mid 1980’s could be considered to be generally warm and wet. Heavy snowfall years regenerated parts of the snowfield, and it appeared that the perpetual snowfield might recover to its previous 1940’s size, but not to the glacier it was before the 1940’s.

Hoever, the late 1980’s produced a severe drought that took a toll on the "glacier", and by 1988 the glacier/snowfield was smaller than it had ever been to that date in recorded history. If you have any photographs from the 1950’s, 1960’s, 1970’s, or 1980's, please add them to the article.

The Timpanogos "Glacier" in 1993 and 1994

Some wet years were not enough to compensate for the drought, and although 1993 was a heavy snow year, the “perpetual” snowfield actually melted out completely (or close to completely) in the terribly dry and hot year of 1994. This was the first time in recorded history that the “perpetual” snowfield melted away. During that year a large crevasse opened up in the talus, revealing glacial ice below. For now it appears the glacier survives and is protected under the talus.

Timp Glacier from Emerald...
My photo of the Timpanogos "Glacier" from Emerald Lake on September 15, 1993

Addition by SP member hyperphil:

I was a crevasse witness. I was on TERT in 1993 [sic-actually 1994?] when the crevasse opened up. John Moellmer found it, and Paul Hart and I went up to check it out. It was eery--deep blue ice, 40 feet thick at least. The hole was DEEP. If you fell in, you'd be 30th century archaeological curiosity. I have a photo of it somewhere in my infernally huge collection of slides. Glen Meyer, the TERT director, got a glaciology team from Washingotn State to assay the ice. Their results were inconclusive as to whether it was truly glacial. The fact that the crevasse did not reappear in 2004 suggests it was moving, that is, glacial. Glacial or not, I NEVER walk down the middle of the snowfield any more.

Timpanogos Glacier Crevasse
A crevasse on the normally buried Timpanogos Glacier in 1994. The man in this photo is actually standing on some rocks that fell and got wedged in, the actual bottom was reported to be at least forty feet down. Glen Meyer, the director of the Timpanogos Emergency Response Team, took this photo, which is used with permission.

Timp Glacier crevasse 1994
A shot into the depths of the crevasse.Glen Meyer photo and used with permission.

The Timpanogos "Glacier" in 2003

Despite some wet years, the drought continues to take a toll on the now sometimes invisible “glacier”. Notice in this photo from September 2003, that the surface ice and perpetual snowfield has once again melted almost completely. When comparing the photos from almost 100 years ago, they are just a reminder of what the “glacier” used to be.

Emerald Lake and the Timp...
The Pluggers' photo of the Timpanogos "Glacier" on September 17, 2003

The Timpanogos "Glacier" Present and Future

No one knows what the future holds for this unique feature in Utah. Some recent winters have produced above normal snowfall, but it would take several years or decades of accumulation to bring the surface appearance of the snowfield/buried glacier back to where it was 100 years ago.

If there is still a glacier buried under the talus, it will probably remain invisible for most of the foreseeable year to come.

The Timp Glacier (top right)...
Gjagiels' Photo from August 9, 2005 in a very heavy snow year.


If anyone else can dig up any old photos of the Timp Glacier, it would be greatly appreciated. Any photos or scans of photos from the late 1800's through the 1950's would be greatly appreciated.

Also, if anyone has any more information on the crevasse that opened up in 1994, please let me know.

If you have ever witnessed any type of crevasse on the Timp Glacier, please post any information that might be useful.

Also, if anyone has witnessed the surface snow and ice melting completely in any other years besides 1994 and 2003, please let me know.

It would be greatly appreciated.



[ Post a Comment ]
Viewing: 1-20 of 41 « PREV 1 2 3 NEXT » 

RyanSVery interesting stuff, Scott


Voted 10/10

Great pictures and text. Definitely a vivid demonstration of glacial retreat.

With these glaciers in the 48 states, I often wonder to what extent they are simply relics of the Little Ice Age, destined to die.
Posted Apr 5, 2006 8:57 pm

mpbroRe: Very interesting stuff, Scott


Hasn't voted

No Ryan, they are incontrovertable proof of human-induced global warming! You see, everything on earth had been hunky-dory for the last 4.5 billion years, before we humans spoiled it. Look out, the sky is falling! ;-)
Posted Apr 6, 2006 1:02 am

brentonjweaverincontrovertable proof of human-induced global warming


Hasn't voted

The earth naturally fluctuates in temperature over thousands of years. I am not arguing that humans are aren't having an impact on global warming, but we are still very much at the end of the last ice age. Even in the past 1000 years there have been warmer periods than we're currently experiencing(see here:http://www.biocab.org/Global_Warming.html). We are still in the cold end of the scale, and things could get much, much hotter before they get cool again. There are also arguments that when the north pole melts, the new body of "warm" water will produce enough moisture to cause moutain glaciers in alaska and siberia to grow to the extent that we will thrown into another deep ice age. Other arguments to support that we're on the verge of another ice age say that we're disrupting ocean currents to the point where it will cause an ice age in the northern hemisphere(http://www.biocab.org/Global_Warming.html). Again, I'm not saying that we're not having an impact, just that this is also part of a very complex cycle.
Posted May 2, 2006 12:17 am

Gangolf HaubSad

Gangolf Haub

Voted 10/10

... but the story is the same everywhere all over the world
Posted Apr 5, 2006 10:13 pm



Voted 10/10

In one century a real glacier with crevasses melted completely and this happens everywhere. I agree with mpbro, mankind is responsible for this and we are like musicians playing on the Titanic before the crash with an iceberg
Posted Apr 6, 2006 12:17 pm

Travis AtwoodNice work

Travis Atwood

Hasn't voted

Great article Scott. I had no idea that our glacier had such a history. It is defiantly as sad story though. Thanks for the post.
Posted Apr 6, 2006 12:23 pm

VelebitSad story


Voted 10/10

Great article Scott but sad story!
Posted Apr 6, 2006 1:54 pm



Hasn't voted

stuff to read....thanks
Posted Apr 7, 2006 1:39 pm

bighornhunterGreat information


Voted 10/10

Thanks for the awsome information. I didn't know that the timp glacier used to be that big. It just says that the world climate is really changing.
Posted Apr 7, 2006 4:04 pm

madsjimGreat article


Voted 10/10

I wonder if the earth had not globally warmed up after the ice age, we'd still be hunting mammoths and saber toothed tigers?
Posted Apr 9, 2006 3:48 am

iamnotclimbwildWell Written!

Voted 10/10

You definitely have a talent.
Posted Apr 11, 2006 7:01 am

dillweedvery interesting


Voted 10/10

Scott, interesting read.

I have been on Timp nearly every year for 20 years, and I have long thought that there was glacial ice below the talus. If you are on the "glacier", say in September, and put your ear down next to the talus rocks, if you are in the right spot you can hear water trickling down the slope, and sometimes it feels very cold - as if there is ice under the rocks. One reason I suspected this was the color and opaque nature of Emerald Lake - something that you only find in glacial runoff.

I am curious, where did you learn about the crevasse that opened up in 1994? I would love to read more about it.

One thing though, your pictures tell a misleading story - the time of year of the photos is inconsistent. They might lead the readers to think that the disappearance is more drastic than it really is (but I am not arguing that it is not disappearing, because it is). There are still July's that look like the July of 1940 - although they are probably much less likely now, unfortunately.

Thanks for the interesting story - keep up the good work.

Emerald Lake, in late June
Posted Apr 11, 2006 6:26 pm

ScottRe: very interesting


Hasn't voted

I am curious, where did you learn about the crevasse that opened up in 1994? I would love to read more about it.

I head it from several climbers as well as one printed article. I can try and find the article at home and PM you about it.

One thing though, your pictures tell a misleading story - the time of year of the photos is inconsistent. They might lead the readers to think that the disappearance is more drastic than it really is (but I am not arguing that it is not disappearing, because it is).

I agree. While it would be better to use photos all from the same month of the year, I haven't any (or I would have used them). The September 2003 photo was used because it showed all visual traces of the glacier, snow, and ice, were gone. I first climbed Timpanogos at age 7 in 1981, so those would be the earliest photos I personally could have. The others are from other sources way before I was born, and none were from September, but from July 30 and August.

The older photos above also were printed in the book Climbers and Hikers Guide to Mount Timpanogos, but the book doesn't have any history on the glacier itself, just the annual Timp hikes.

For an interesting read about the crevasses that used to exist, try finding the 1912 trip report of an ascent of Timpanogos. At that time, the normal route up the mountain was right up the glacier and there were apparently a series of crevasses to walk around. I have never seen the TR online, but if you ever see it, it is an interesting read.
Posted Apr 11, 2006 7:03 pm

dillweedRe: very interesting


Voted 10/10

Right on. I own the book - it's got a lot of good info, including my favorite part - deaths on Mt. Timpanogos. Timp is by far my favorte mountain of them all. She seems to have a personality all her own. It's no wonder that it is Utah's most hiked summit.
Posted Apr 11, 2006 8:25 pm

ZachWnice article


Hasn't voted

From what I can see it looks to be a rock glacier, much like the one on Nevada's Wheeler Peak. A rock glacier is a piece of ice that is covered with talus and moves much slower than a normal glacier (to the tune of about a half inch a year). The rock and debris insulates it and they can survive for a very long time for that reason. Thanks for the article. I have been wondering about the status of this glacier for a couple years now.
Posted Apr 12, 2006 2:03 am

ScottRe: nice article


Hasn't voted

Thanks for the compliment! If you are interested, here is a litte more on rock glaciers:

From what I can see it looks to be a rock glacier, much like the one on Nevada's Wheeler Peak. A rock glacier is a piece of ice that is covered with talus and moves much slower than a normal glacier (to the tune of about a half inch a year).

Well, sort of. A rock glacier is actually rocks cemented together by ice that flow slowly like a glacier. A rock-covered glacier is a glacier/ice sheet covered with rocks/debris. It is hard to tell the difference between the two. Apparently, since 1994 at least, test on the ice in the crevasse, show that this is probably a rock-covered glacier. For now.

There is some controversy over the Wheeler rock glacier you mention as well. The upper end next to the headwall is known as the Wheeler Glacier, but sometimes known as an icefield, glacier, or "glacierette". It does have visible and real crevasses, albeit small, so it seems to be a very small glacier. The lower end is known as a rock glacier as you say, but some geologist think it is actually a rock-covered glacier. Apparently the same controversy exist on the Dove, on the north side of Longs Peak in Colorado as well.
Posted Apr 12, 2006 4:32 pm

Sam DunfordRe: nice article

Voted 10/10

Geologists actually consider both ice-cemented rocks and rock-covered glaciers to be rock glaciers. Those two forms are actually more like ends on a spectrum than separate categories, a lot of rock glaciers contain both massive and interstitial ice. In fact, one might consider even ice-cemented rock glaciers to be true glaciers, since they form in much the same way except with a lot more debris involved.
Posted Jan 7, 2016 1:31 pm

ZachWwheeler peak glacier


Hasn't voted

I went to Great Basin at the end of last September to see for myself.A ranger told me that the previous winter brought 300% more snow than normal. There were no crevasses. There was still glacier ice under about a foot of firn that I hacked through with my ice axe.I did see what appeared to be several rock glaciers from the summit of Wheeler Peak. I still cant get over the fact that there is a glacier in Nevada.
Posted Apr 14, 2006 12:49 am

ScottRe: wheeler peak glacier


Hasn't voted

If you ever make it back, the only place I'm aware of that has crevasses, are some small ones one the cirque headwall. At the cirque headwall, above the rock glacier, there is a really big Y-couloir that contains a glacierette/small glacier/icefield. Only if you climb a ways up the couloir will you see any crevasses (and they are small, but are in ice rather than snow). Late season its pretty icy, but early season, it will be snow and easier. If you ever make it back, the Y couloir and headwall makes an interesting trip, but use exteme caution with the rockfall danger.
Posted Apr 15, 2006 1:14 am

mauri peltovaluable documentary

mauri pelto

Voted 10/10

As a glaciologist who is always on the lookout for new interesting information on glacier changes this is a wonderful portrayal of the death of a glacier. I am not certain whether the relic ice is ice cored moraine or a rock glacier now. To be the latter there must be some movement. This glacier is not alone, many others in the Pacific Northwest and Rockies are being lost.
Posted Apr 16, 2006 2:08 pm

Viewing: 1-20 of 41 « PREV 1 2 3 NEXT »