Diego Sahagún - Apr 26, 2003 3:32 am - Hasn't voted
This pic is not worthy to be voted? ;-)Thanks, Diego.
Diego Sahagún - Apr 26, 2003 5:38 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: This pic is not worthy to be voted? ;-)Fred, it's grainy because the film is a Kodak 400 and there wasn't much light when it was taken. The contrast is week in the background because the sky was cloudy there, so it was white as the snow. The colours seems unreal because they have been retouched with software. I thought that if Kenzo does it and get many well voted pics I could do as well but I've just noticed that I can't. I really don't know why the people don't vote since it has had 28 hits til now. At least it calls the attention of the SP'ers :-)
Diego Sahagún - Apr 26, 2003 7:36 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: This pic is not worthy to be voted? ;-)Probably, but I'd say you that the resolution of the original pic is not low, it's 103 KB (as .jpg) and have a size of 751 x 551 pixels.
paule - Apr 28, 2003 1:56 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: This pic is not worthy to be voted? ;-)Diego,
With resolution settings like that, I am surprised that the picture turned out as clear as it did. SP has a maximum allowance of size and resolution for posting, but for maximum effectiveness, you always want to submit a photo in the best condition you can, so that it will still look good even if SP resizes it.
All of my photos are submitted in their native form at 1600x1200 and between 800K to 1Meg each.
Huberschwiller - May 3, 2003 1:31 pm - Hasn't voted
Thank youThank you for uploading a photo on my page and sorry that it was not well voted. I have quite the same photo, and I uploaded them today. It was shot in other weather and light conditions. Thank you for your comment.
Jean-Louis Huberschwiller
Comments
Post a Comment