| The Endless Range | [ Sizes: Orig | Med | Small | Thumb ] |
In the case of this particular image I feel it's best to show the photograph much larger than the maximum uncompressed resolution of about 560 pixels (long side) on this website. Therefore, you must click on the photo to see the Larger version to appreciate the fine details that make this photograph work. Otherwise, you get some compression damage to the image. This vast expanse was captured from my campsite at over 9000 feet on Washington's Mount Rainier, Ptarmigan Ridge, looking towards the North Cascade range at sunset. The 'Larger' version (975 pixels) really puts you there! Thanks for commenting.
Comments
[ Post a Comment ]| MountainManV | Amazing, absolutely amazing | | 
Hasn't voted | My dreams of climbing Rainier have just been solidified by this picture. Fantastic photo, sights like this are why I hike and climb. Thanks for the larger version, it truly brings out the expansiveness of the mountains. | | Posted Aug 13, 2007 10:54 am |
| hhsilleck | Fantastic! | | 
Voted 10/10 | Again! Absolutely incredible! Thanks for posting!
Howie | | Posted Aug 13, 2007 11:01 am |
| Corax | Top notch! | | 
Voted 10/10 | Amazing! | | Posted Aug 13, 2007 3:15 pm |
| mtnman455 | Yep. | | 
Voted 10/10 | I couldn't agree more on how vibrant the image becomes when you inlarge it. Bravo. | | Posted Aug 16, 2007 11:26 am |
| Nanuls | Top stuff! | | 
Voted 10/10 | Another great photo Marc, absolutly amazing! | | Posted Aug 18, 2007 9:31 am |
| SFMountaineer | Amazing! | | 
Voted 10/10 | What did you do in post production? | | Posted Aug 20, 2007 3:16 pm |
| MOCKBA | Friggin awesome & I wonder if it can be annotated | | 
Voted 10/10 | kind of in the mold of this view - just how far, how big are these chains of mountains out on the horizon? | | Posted Aug 26, 2007 5:14 pm |
 | | Marc Adamus | Re: Friggin awesome & I wonder if it can be annotated | | 
Hasn't voted | The highest peak prominant in the distant ranges shown here is Glacier Peak (10,300ft) roughly 120 miles North. The other peaks are 6000-9000 feet above the valleys which are close to sea level. | | Posted Aug 26, 2007 5:30 pm |
| Cedar | Wow! | | 
Voted 10/10 | Fantasic photo. | | Posted Aug 26, 2007 7:08 pm |
| Mark Doiron | I've Added This Great Image | | 
Voted 10/10 | Marc--I've added this great image to the custom object Worth Another Look II. Let me know if that's a problem. -mark d. | | Posted Sep 3, 2007 5:42 am |
| argothor | Beautiful | | 
Hasn't voted | Great lighting, color and definition. Thanks for sharing. | | Posted Mar 7, 2008 8:26 pm |
| Noondueler | Heavenly lighting... | | 
Voted 10/10 | ...on the clouds. | | Posted Nov 4, 2008 7:00 pm |
| MarcAdamusLIES | One of his only decent film images | | Hasn't voted | Notice the boastful manner in which Marc describes it all. It's as if getting to 9000 feet is an epic accomplishment. Of course, Marc is no mountaineer & has no place on Summitpost.
Eric Hut
MarcAdamusLIES.com
Eric.Hut@MarcAdamusLIES.com | | Posted Apr 1, 2009 8:44 pm |
|  Rate This Image Current Score: 92.68%  Loading... To Vote
|
