| Skuta, its surroundings and... | [ Sizes: Orig | Med | Small | Thumb ] |
Skuta, its surroundings and some of its paths. Red are marked paths, black are not marked.
Comments
[ Post a Comment ]| rokaj | Skuta | | 
Hasn't voted | Questions:
Are paths (for example, Gamsov skret or Zmavcarji) good visible in summer time or you can missed the way?
Are there some danger spots (climbing places more than II ) on this paths?
Thank you and regards ROK | | Posted Dec 16, 2004 2:05 pm |
 | | Bor | Re: Skuta | | 
Voted 8/10 | Rok: the route over the Zmavcarje valley is very nice seen now because it has many visitors and it is very popular in Summer (in Winter for tour skiing). You won`t miss it..in next days I will describe this description of the route too!
The route over Gamsov skret is harder because it has a short wall on the right side of Kogel. But I am not sure for this but I think it is secured. When I was hiking there I went over this narrow more on the left over some shelves in the face of Kogel (very airy).
Maybe Vid know some more data about that.
Cheers! | | Posted Dec 16, 2004 4:18 pm |
| | rokaj | Re: Skuta | |
Hasn't voted | Thanks, Bor. Now it`s easier to decide where to go up to Skuta. Not this year. I was on Kamnisko sedlo last week and the path was icy on some places. Next summer. Thank you again. LP ROK | | Posted Dec 16, 2004 4:38 pm |
| | Vid Pogachnik | Re: Skuta | | 
Hasn't voted | No, I haven't ascended over Gamsov skret yet :-( | | Posted Dec 17, 2004 1:39 pm |
| megla | 2533 | | 
Voted 10/10 | It is intersting that the altitude mentioned on the map is 2533. Nowadays I read 2532 more often.
| | Posted Feb 7, 2009 9:58 am |
| | Vid Pogachnik | Re: 2533 | |
Hasn't voted | Similar was with Triglav. Long time 2863, now 2864. | | Posted Feb 7, 2009 2:18 pm |
| | megla | Re: 2533 | |
Voted 10/10 | Skuta looses one and Triglav gets one. No material loss! | | Posted Feb 7, 2009 2:31 pm |
|  Rate This Image Current Score: 65.64%  Loading... To Vote
|
Skuta > Skuta normal (S) > Image
