Welcome to SP!  -   
 
 MbPost.com -- It's SP for Mountain Biking!
Areas & Ranges·Mountains & Rocks·Routes·Images·Articles·Trip Reports·Gear·Other·People·Plans & Partners·What's New·Forum

Safer variation of the Las... [ Sizes: Orig | Med | Small | Thumb ]
Safer variation of the Las...
Safer variation of the Las Latas route (photo taken by myself on December 31, 1998). You can also head to the area just right of this photo to climb up or down. Since the glacier has receded La Canaleta has become very dangerous and deaths have occured. We watched several bus-sized boulders crash down the gully on that day. That same night, a huge rock avalanche occured which we (Kimberly, Russell, Jan, and myself) could here all the way from Las Cuevas (several thousand feet below and several kms (miles) away). Paul and Leslie were camped at Las Latas and reported huge crashes throughout the night, and not much sleep because of all the noise from boulders crashing down the Caneleta. The moral of the story is don't take this route, especially since a safer route is nearby.


Comments

No comments posted yet.


Sign in to post!

Don't have an account? Register now.


Rate This Image
Current Score: 84.48

Log In To Vote
 Nevado del Tolima (Mountain/Rock)


« PREV

Viewing
#36 of 141
GALLERY

NEXT »

 Scott's Image Gallery


« PREV

Viewing
#2366 of 3300
GALLERY

NEXT »


 Normal Via Latas (Route)


Image Data

Submitted by Scott
on Mar 11, 2005 3:59 pm

Image ID: 94428
Hits: 1137 



"In fact, I think you should add your body fat to the rating of the climb, to get a true measure of your inner climber. So climbing a 5.7 with 22% body fat is way harder than climbing a 5.14 with 3% body fat."   --Mike Yukish   

© 2006 SummitPost.org. All Rights Reserved.