Antonio Giani - Oct 18, 2005 11:27 am - Voted 10/10
Ottima!Ciao Antonio
livioz - Oct 20, 2005 7:30 am - Voted 10/10
was it...difficult for Andy to stay in that position, since the image is clearly rotated 90 degrees clockwise? ;-))
Fine shot!
brenta - Oct 20, 2005 10:30 am - Hasn't voted
Re: was it...I cannot vouch for the camera being perfectly horizontal, given that I was rather precariously perched on a rock to get a good angle for this shot, but it is definitely not rotated by 90°.
hkutuk - Oct 20, 2005 2:14 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: was it...Agreed, not rotated. If you want you could leave the rope in the anchor rings after the rappel and use it as a top rope to climb this 5.10+ Friday's Folly route.
brenta - Oct 20, 2005 2:39 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: was it...Is Friday's Folly really 5.10+? Both Rossiter and climbingboulder.com rate it 5.7. There was a party climbing it when we came down, and my impression was that it would be a rather stiff 5.7, but from 5.7 to 5.10+ is quite a gap.
livioz - Oct 21, 2005 4:16 pm - Voted 10/10
Re: was it...Sorry, but I thought it was obvious that mine was only a joke! However in this way I could learn from you some technical term, unknown to a simple hiker as I am...
Cheers!
mtnsavy - Nov 4, 2005 9:17 am - Hasn't voted
Re: was it...I think you mean Saturday's Folly (5.8-5.9), which directly follows the rap route. Friday's Folly (definitely no more than 5.7) isn't easily toproped from the bottom due to its length and wandering nature.
Comments
Post a Comment