And fast,too. Great list! I was having some trouble envisioning a list page and its purpose. Thanks for filling in the blanks. Great job with the URLs, too. Nice to have you at SP. BTW-I removed the Table of Contents. It was interfering with your chart (as an admin, I can do that). If you want it back, you can certainly put it back there.
very nice page! I was looking at some peaks I am familiar with, and it seems to be that for many of the peaks, the USGS quadrant is not correct, but the correct quadrant is lined up with another mountain near it on the list. Could there be an accidental incorrect lining of the cells?
Aaron Johnson - Feb 14, 2006 1:45 am - Hasn't voted
Nice Job!And fast,too. Great list! I was having some trouble envisioning a list page and its purpose. Thanks for filling in the blanks. Great job with the URLs, too. Nice to have you at SP. BTW-I removed the Table of Contents. It was interfering with your chart (as an admin, I can do that). If you want it back, you can certainly put it back there.
rioblanco13 - Feb 22, 2006 4:30 am - Hasn't voted
good job, but quadrants offvery nice page! I was looking at some peaks I am familiar with, and it seems to be that for many of the peaks, the USGS quadrant is not correct, but the correct quadrant is lined up with another mountain near it on the list. Could there be an accidental incorrect lining of the cells?
John Kirk - Feb 23, 2006 9:48 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: good job, but quadrants offThanks for pointing that out - not sure what happened, but should be fixed now.
McCannster - Sep 23, 2006 5:59 pm - Voted 10/10
JeezThat's a lot of 11er's.
seth@LOKI - May 9, 2008 2:30 am - Voted 10/10
you daman! thanks for the fun of purousing your lists! I feel so lazy now... =]