Although I have maintained my own list of these in an excel file, this is great work with all of the mapping and lnks to the respective pages. Kudos on a job well done!
It would be great if you could number the ranks of the peaks so that the peaks with the same elevation have the same rank. This is the way it is done on other sites like Lists of John. This makes the bicentennial list make more sense, in that since there are five peaks at 13580, they are all ranked 198th, and the last two aren't off the list just because of alphabetization.
Though I admire John for trying something different, he and I don't agree on this.
I agree with you when you say that alphabetical order is far too arbitrary a thing to break rank ties. Therefore, I prefer to break ties with prominence (and when there's a prominence tie, as well, to use isolation to break the tie). I simply don't like the idea of peaks not having a unique rank, and this also makes it easier on a spreadsheet for sorting purposes. Prominence information will be added to this list once I finish double-checking Roach's figures (he has a number of errors), so this method of breaking ties will be clearer at that point.
Truth be told, not a ton. There's a relatively easy way to convert a spreadsheet into table form, and Gareth got the legwork done quickly. To keep it current, it's just a matter of adding new SP links when people submit new pages.
Kane - Apr 5, 2006 1:35 am - Voted 10/10
Great Work!This is a sweet list, I'll attatch it to my thirteener pages. Every once in a while ya'll will need to update links, how fun!
Rob A - Apr 5, 2006 12:25 pm - Voted 10/10
Wow!Nice job, I did not know that there were that many 13ers in CO.
good job.
Later, Rob
ColoradoScott - Apr 5, 2006 3:31 pm - Hasn't voted
Thanks Guys!Although I have maintained my own list of these in an excel file, this is great work with all of the mapping and lnks to the respective pages. Kudos on a job well done!
dlsunwall - Apr 7, 2006 6:02 pm - Voted 10/10
NiceWill be very handy.
Kane - Apr 15, 2006 2:29 am - Voted 10/10
garethUN13,768 Holy cross Ridge is covered in my Holy Cross Ridge page. Currently there is no link.
Gareth - Apr 15, 2006 3:37 am - Hasn't voted
Re: garethLinked. I’m surprised I missed that one.
csmcgranahan - Apr 17, 2006 1:16 am - Voted 10/10
Very nice!This list is a great resource! Thank you very much for all of your efforts.
markhyams - Apr 20, 2006 3:34 pm - Hasn't voted
rankingIt would be great if you could number the ranks of the peaks so that the peaks with the same elevation have the same rank. This is the way it is done on other sites like Lists of John. This makes the bicentennial list make more sense, in that since there are five peaks at 13580, they are all ranked 198th, and the last two aren't off the list just because of alphabetization.
Cheers,
Mark
RyanS - Apr 20, 2006 9:48 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: rankingHi Mark,
Though I admire John for trying something different, he and I don't agree on this.
I agree with you when you say that alphabetical order is far too arbitrary a thing to break rank ties. Therefore, I prefer to break ties with prominence (and when there's a prominence tie, as well, to use isolation to break the tie). I simply don't like the idea of peaks not having a unique rank, and this also makes it easier on a spreadsheet for sorting purposes. Prominence information will be added to this list once I finish double-checking Roach's figures (he has a number of errors), so this method of breaking ties will be clearer at that point.
Andinistaloco - Apr 21, 2006 10:58 pm - Voted 10/10
10/10Nice work here guys. Having done tables in html lately, I can appreciate the time this must have taken.
Brad Snider - May 4, 2006 2:29 am - Voted 10/10
Some of CO's best mountains!Great list!!! Thanks for your work on this.
One small note: McNamee Peak can be linked to the "Clinton, McNamee, Traver" Peaks page. Thanks.
Gareth - May 4, 2006 2:59 am - Hasn't voted
Re: Some of CO's best mountains!Linked. It’s strange that I linked the other two and missed McNamee. Glad you like the list.
km_donovan - Jul 30, 2006 7:41 pm - Voted 10/10
This Page Rates 5 Beiners!Two ice axes up for a great job.
RyanS - Apr 13, 2007 5:03 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Long timeTruth be told, not a ton. There's a relatively easy way to convert a spreadsheet into table form, and Gareth got the legwork done quickly. To keep it current, it's just a matter of adding new SP links when people submit new pages.
dirth - Jul 6, 2008 12:47 pm - Hasn't voted
Ruby MountainHi,
Just noticed that there is no link to Ruby's page, I'm sure updating these is a huge project in itself.
http://www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/333755/ruby-mountain.html
Gareth - Jul 6, 2008 1:46 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Ruby MountainIt's now linked. Nice catch!
Sarah Simon - Dec 31, 2008 4:30 pm - Voted 10/10
Please attached "Cupid"Hello,
Please attach my new-ish "Cupid" page to this list.
http://www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/473211/-Cupid-.html
PS: I tried to do attach this myself, but it seems the permissions are set so that "self service attachment" is not an option.
Cheers,
Sarah
Gareth - Jan 1, 2009 4:40 pm - Hasn't voted
Re: Please attachedSarah,
You did the trick and attached the page. I went in and linked the table to the page. Thanks for helping me keep the new pages linked!
mattpayne11 - May 20, 2009 9:58 pm - Hasn't voted
Link to "South Snowdon"Ranked 611
http://www.summitpost.org/mountain/rock/509434/south-snowdon.html
Thx!
JustinShapiro - Sep 4, 2009 5:40 pm - Voted 10/10
Link to Jenkins MountainAwsome list but guys, you gotta update the links.
Link for Jenkins Mountain:
http://www.summitpost.org/view_object.php?object_id=549167&confirm_post=7