Viewing: 1-6 of 6
Gangolf Haub

Gangolf Haub - Jul 23, 2004 4:27 am - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

This is stretching things too far! four pages on one day! Suppose you heard about our clubhouse (1000pt club) and decided you wanted to be with the crowd!

Nicely done - all of them.



mtwashingtonmonroe - Jul 23, 2004 12:43 pm - Voted 10/10

Untitled Comment

Another good one!


Moogie737 - Sep 14, 2006 8:23 pm - Hasn't voted

Which peak is the higher?

Do we have any official information as to which of the peaks is "the higher"? One would assume that the survey marker might carry some weight in the matter, but one could be wrong, too.


Scott - Sep 14, 2006 9:33 pm - Voted 10/10

Re: Which peak is the higher?

Actually the NW peak is higher. Assuming the contours are correct it would have to be between 10480-10520 feet high versus 10479 for one with the benchmark.

Interpolated (closest method), the summit would be written as 10500. By clean prominence, it would be written as 10480+. Either way, the unmarked peak is highest.


PellucidWombat - Sep 14, 2006 10:14 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Which peak is the higher?

Just make sure to climb both, then there is no uncertainty! :-D


Moogie737 - Sep 15, 2006 3:50 pm - Hasn't voted

Re: Which peak is the higher?

Thanks very much for the additional insight.

Viewing: 1-6 of 6
Return to 'Honeycomb Cliffs' main page