I have looked at it again and as far as I remember you claimed this page because there was a lot of additional posts not been taken care of. That is still the case, even though many of them are by yourself. If you include the posts you find relevant and delete the ones you find irrelevant or incorrect I will reconsider my vote.
Btw. why have you ticked the "I reached the summit" flag when you write that you you got to a point 200 m above the pass? It is not important and I don´t really care, but it still seems a bit incorrect to me.
There are a whole lot of comments from other people and not much information in the body. It does not appear that the comments have been responded to, although I understand many of them are just a day or two old. With additions and corrections, my vote will be raised, but such a beautiful mountain deserves a better page.
(edit) I agree with everything that Fred has said, you should still probably delete the additions and corrections of others once you have dealt with them. Your text will need some proofreading, but the information is good. You have improved this page a lot. Thanks!
Sorry it took me so long to edit my original vote. The page looks great now. Thanks a lot for adding it, I always wondered what this mountain looked like.
Scott - Jul 7, 2004 6:18 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice changes
hgrapid - Jul 7, 2004 9:39 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood update. Keep working on it.
Pawkala - Jul 7, 2004 9:56 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentMuch Better
mtwashingtonmonroe - Jul 7, 2004 10:58 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood job and way to turn it into a good one. Keep up the good work and have good one!
palic - Aug 16, 2004 5:31 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentI became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you!
awillson - Jul 9, 2004 3:09 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentMuch better.
palic - Aug 16, 2004 5:31 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentI became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you!
JXM - Jul 17, 2004 5:00 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentI am very pleased to see that you have put up this page. It brings back very good memories from our expedition to Kamchatka.
palic - Aug 16, 2004 5:32 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentI became a new maintainer of Klyuchevskaja sopka page. Please, feel free to look at it once more. Thank you!
JXM - Aug 30, 2004 3:00 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentI have looked at it again and as far as I remember you claimed this page because there was a lot of additional posts not been taken care of. That is still the case, even though many of them are by yourself. If you include the posts you find relevant and delete the ones you find irrelevant or incorrect I will reconsider my vote.
JXM - Aug 30, 2004 3:05 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentBtw. why have you ticked the "I reached the summit" flag when you write that you you got to a point 200 m above the pass? It is not important and I don´t really care, but it still seems a bit incorrect to me.
The Lower Marmot - Aug 12, 2004 4:57 pm - Voted 8/10
Untitled CommentThere are a whole lot of comments from other people and not much information in the body. It does not appear that the comments have been responded to, although I understand many of them are just a day or two old. With additions and corrections, my vote will be raised, but such a beautiful mountain deserves a better page.
(edit) I agree with everything that Fred has said, you should still probably delete the additions and corrections of others once you have dealt with them. Your text will need some proofreading, but the information is good. You have improved this page a lot. Thanks!
palic - Aug 16, 2004 5:09 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentWell, I did not have time to rearrange the page from the former maintainer, try to check it now!
tlogan - Aug 13, 2004 9:59 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentSorry it took me so long to edit my original vote. The page looks great now. Thanks a lot for adding it, I always wondered what this mountain looked like.
palic - Aug 16, 2004 5:10 am - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentWell, I did not have time to rearrange the page from the former maintainer, try to check it now! It is completely redesigned
Fred Spicker - Aug 16, 2004 8:47 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentCertainly better than it was...... And way better than zero stars!
McCannster - Dec 1, 2005 7:36 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled Commentcool
calebEOC - Aug 19, 2009 10:28 pm - Voted 10/10
Glaciers?I dont see any major glaciers which seems surprising for 15k feet at these latitudes.