Nice page! Also good job addressing the elevation issue with this peak (so people can see what you're talking about, you'll probably want to have the TopoZone link point to the true summit at these coordinates: 37.8537, -108.1080).
One small correction, though. Because the quad uses 40-foot contours, the highest possible elevation for Middle is 13,319', and its interpolated elevation is 13,300' per Roach and Garratt/Martin.
mtwashingtonmonroe - Aug 19, 2005 8:50 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page!
-Britt
Gangolf Haub - Aug 19, 2005 9:10 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentVery nice page!
Corax - Aug 19, 2005 9:32 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentA nice little page and an interesting peak, I've never heard of before.
Ed F - Aug 19, 2005 11:01 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice addition.
RyanS - Aug 22, 2005 2:41 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice page! Also good job addressing the elevation issue with this peak (so people can see what you're talking about, you'll probably want to have the TopoZone link point to the true summit at these coordinates: 37.8537, -108.1080).
One small correction, though. Because the quad uses 40-foot contours, the highest possible elevation for Middle is 13,319', and its interpolated elevation is 13,300' per Roach and Garratt/Martin.
brenta - Aug 24, 2005 11:27 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentWell written and complete page. Coverage of lesser peaks is one of the strengths of SP. Thanks for contributing to it!
Larry V - Aug 27, 2005 8:43 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood directions. I think I'll avoid this route however, as I really dislike hiking through swamps.