Any good places to 'aclimatize' before a Rainier summit?

Regional discussion and conditions reports for Washington and Oregon. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the Pacific Northwest Climbing Partners section.
User Avatar
NJTripper

 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:56 pm
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Any good places to 'aclimatize' before a Rainier summit?

by NJTripper » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:28 am

Being a flatlander... I want to be minimize the mpact of altitude when I attempt Rainier.

Are there any accessible high-altitude camps with decent hiking opportunities in the area?

I was thinking about coming out a couple days before Rainier, camp above 9k and (maybe) bag a couple lesser peaks... all while improving my alclimatization.

Any suggestions?

User Avatar
Scott
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 8328
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 1:03 pm
Thanked: 1135 times in 593 posts

by Scott » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:56 am

camp above 9k and (maybe) bag a couple lesser peaks


Lunch Counter (campsite) on Mount Adams is at 9K. As long as you know how to self arrest and the weather is good, Mt. Adams via the south ridge is a farily easy ascent (in a technical sense) and doesn't require roping up.

User Avatar
billisfree

 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 am
Thanked: 16 times in 14 posts

by billisfree » Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:06 am

Go skiing

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3630
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 654 times in 488 posts

by ExcitableBoy » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:00 pm

I second South Spur on Mt Adams. If you are going that far south then Mt Hood will be pretty close. You could hike up the south side and camp at the Illumination Rock saddle which I think is over 9,000 ft. Also consider hiking up to camp Muir on Rainier which is at 10,000 ft.

One thing to keep in mind is that most of the locals live at sea level and will go from their homes to the summit in under 24 hrs with no prior acclimatization. My feeling is that by being as fit as possible, going as light as possible, and being as hydrated as possible will give you your best shot. Certainly climbing and camping at altitude will help, just make sure you are well rested, fed, and hydrated after the acclimatization climbs before you tackle Rainier.

Best of luck!

EB

User Avatar
Snidely Whiplash

 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:08 pm
Thanked: 806 times in 450 posts

by Snidely Whiplash » Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:24 pm

ExcitibleBoy wrote:I second South Spur on Mt Adams. If you are going that far south then Mt Hood will be pretty close. You could hike up the south side and camp at the Illumination Rock saddle which I think is over 9,000 ft. Also consider hiking up to camp Muir on Rainier which is at 10,000 ft.

One thing to keep in mind is that most of the locals live at sea level and will go from their homes to the summit in under 24 hrs with no prior acclimatization. My feeling is that by being as fit as possible, going as light as possible, and being as hydrated as possible will give you your best shot. Certainly climbing and camping at altitude will help, just make sure you are well rested, fed, and hydrated after the acclimatization climbs before you tackle Rainier.

Best of luck!

EB


ExcitableBoy is right on as far as being fit, going light, and keeping hydrated. As far as acclimatization goes, Washington State does have a disadvantage here in that so few areas of the state exceed 9,000 feet in elevation. A lot of people just hang out a day at Camp Muir (10,080 feet) or Camp Shurman (9,460 feet), depending on the route you're climbing. They use the day to practice crevasse rescue skills, melt water, and generally rest.

User Avatar
Snowslogger

 
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 12:50 pm
Thanked: 12 times in 9 posts

by Snowslogger » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:53 pm

Even an extra day or two staying at Paradise in Mt. Rainier park would probably help (5,400 ft, think Denver).

User Avatar
NJTripper

 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:56 pm
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

Will have to look into that...

by NJTripper » Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:17 am

billisfree wrote:Go skiing


I've never skied in WA - and it would be a hassle to slug my gear out from NJ...

Maybe a local rental would be in order.....

User Avatar
NJTripper

 
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:56 pm
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

by NJTripper » Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:20 am

Lunch Counter (campsite) on Mount Adams is at 9K. As long as you know how to self arrest and the weather is good, Mt. Adams via the south ridge is a farily easy ascent (in a technical sense) and doesn't require roping up.[/quote]

Thanks for the suggestion... I looked at the SP write-up on Adams and it looks like a good option...

Will do some more research...

Thanks!

User Avatar
Moni

 
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 11:15 am
Thanked: 4 times in 3 posts

by Moni » Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:42 am

When is this trip? You don't seem to indicate the dates.

User Avatar
Brad Marshall

 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:54 pm
Thanked: 17 times in 15 posts

by Brad Marshall » Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:08 am

Moni wrote:When is this trip? You don't seem to indicate the dates.


Also, are you going with a group of friends or with a guiding company?

User Avatar
billisfree

 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 am
Thanked: 16 times in 14 posts

by billisfree » Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:45 am

Sorry about my teasing jest about "go skiing".

Well... just about all of us on the Pacific coast face your problem. Most all of us are from the cities, Portland, Seattle, Tacoma, etc. then we have a two day weekend - to climb a mountain.

That's the norm around here.

I live at 300ft above sea level... and climbed Mt Hood (11,240ft) the next morning. I've done Mt. Adams (12,240ft) after a bivoac at 9,400 ft. Mt Adams CAN be climbed in one day from sea level and some people do. And I did Mt Shasha (14,267 ft) with a camp at 8,000 and 10,400 ft.

I normally need a week to recover afterwards because I am tired and sore.

Why can't you drive up to Palisade Inn and sleep in your car at 6,000 ft?
Climb to Camp Muir and stay two nights at Camp Muir at 10,400 ft?
It's going to be difficult to find a 9,000 ft peak to climb - most of the trail heads are snowed in.

My biggest concern is not aclimatization... but getting in shape. Aclimatization is for higher mountains.

User Avatar
dskoon

 
Posts: 3122
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:06 am
Thanked: 136 times in 104 posts

by dskoon » Wed Apr 14, 2010 6:32 am

billisfree wrote:My biggest concern is not aclimatization... but getting in shape. Aclimatization is for higher mountains.


Uh, acclimatization can be fairly important on something that is 14,000+ft. Can even be important on smaller stuff, as altitude affects everyone differently.

User Avatar
billisfree

 
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:39 am
Thanked: 16 times in 14 posts

by billisfree » Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:37 am

You're right dskoon... different people... different effects.

A fella who climbed the world's 3rd highest mountain describes an experience on lowly Mt. Adams. He climbed with four others. One lagged behind and couldn't keep up. Four went up and left one behind. But the fifth made it to the top 20 minutes later.

Going down... they realized the fifth wasn't with them. They had to go back and locate missing man. He was all confused, wandering off in the wrong direction. They had to turn him around and make sure he stayed with them.

It shows that even at 11,000 ft, people can get into trouble.

My son ocassionally climbs with me. He pushes hard, leaving me behind. But he always gets headaches above 8,000 ft. I never get them. Somebody said if you ascend slower, their is less risk of altitude problems.

User Avatar
Brad Marshall

 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:54 pm
Thanked: 17 times in 15 posts

by Brad Marshall » Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:02 pm

dskoon wrote:
billisfree wrote:My biggest concern is not aclimatization... but getting in shape. Aclimatization is for higher mountains.


Uh, acclimatization can be fairly important on something that is 14,000+ft. Can even be important on smaller stuff, as altitude affects everyone differently.


I agree. For most climbers altitudes in this range don't pose a serious health hazard like HAPE or HACE but it can occur and should always be on your mind. For many though these altitudes pose more of a physical difficulty on summit day. Those strong climbers on the PNW can ascend something like Rainier in two days but for many climbers the 4,000+ foot summit day after they just got to 10,000' is too much. Perhaps that's why the summit rate is only around 50% for this montain on the normal routes. A better strategy would be to climb it in three days hiking up to 12-12,500 on the second day to help acclimatization.

no avatar
markv

 
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 5:16 am
Thanked: 3 times in 3 posts

by markv » Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:27 am

For what it's worth, the Adams south side route is fairly pretty. Not that there's a thing wrong with Paradise or Camp Muir, but i would have more fun hanging out on Adams to acclimatize, getting some good grub down in Trout Lake maybe, and then heading to Rainier afterwards. I've done each peak once in the quickest fashion, and it'd be nice to spend some more time. Take advantage if you can.

Next

Return to Pacific Northwest (WA, OR)

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests