[/quote]2600fromatari wrote:Rick,
Your ratings are interesting. I didn't think people who have done these peaks could have such different opinions.
I'm surprised that you rank Russell (9.3) lower than White Mountain (9.5) via the main trail. Russell has double the elevation gain (and that scree slog from UBSL is nasty) and more technical.
Mt. Muir via the main trail tied with North Palisade, and higher than Thunderbolt, Sill, and Middle Palisade: I think Muir is easy-breezy while the T-Bolt and Nor-Pal is a pain having to talus hop from Agassiz to Thunderbolt Pass then go up that scree chute. I would rank Sill right below Tilli/Willi. Mid-Pal I can do in a day, but would not enjoy it. The boulder hopping from Finger Lake is a pain, and the exposure is on another level compared to Muir from the main trail.
If you don't mind, I'm curious as to how you came to your numbers. Right now, I'm guessing you rank Russell so low because it was so enjoyable for you it made the trip easy while Muir was so painfully boring boring via the Whitney Trail that you bumped it up.
2600fromatari,
I'll apologize again for the jumbled presentation of my sreadsheet. I see it's been misinterpreted. The ratings you've questioned are from the published 'Richins' table. I included those just for contrast to another perspective. I take the same exceptions to the Richins ratings as you do.
My ratings are represented by the first number in the string of numbers in my post. On my spreadsheet, they are in a column labeled "Calculated Hiking Time (hours)". That's how rate them in terms of total hours of effort. So, my ratings for Russell and White are 16.73, and 6.15 respectively. In other words, I rank White as the easiest or requiring the least effort at 6.15 hours. I rank Russell as 6th in terms of increasing difficulty, requiring 16.73 hours of effort.
My rating formula is: the one way distance divided by 1/3 of the approach hike factor (1 to 5), plus the vertical gain divided by 1,000 plus the technical climbing factor (a scale of 1-5 the YTD more or less) in my spreadsheet the formula is expressed as: =(G4*K4/3)+(J4/1000)+L4. It may not be scientifically and mathematically perfect but it comes very close to the travel durations that I experienced getting to the 15 listed summits. If you'd like to see my spreadsheet in un-altered Excel format, PM me with your e-mail and I'll send it to you.
My enjoyment doesn't factor in to my effort rating or ranking whatsoever. I enjoyed summiting all of them but Split was my least enjoyable. Split is right in middle at number 7, 18.17 hours. At the time I was recovering from broken ribs and I had done little training.