Cascades Better than the Sierra?

Minimally moderated forum for climbing related hearsay, misinformation, and lies.
User Avatar
SKI

 
Posts: 275
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:52 pm
Thanked: 47 times in 27 posts

Re: Cascades Better than the Sierra?

by SKI » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:56 am

MVS, you're a saint.
THANK YOU!

User Avatar
mvs

 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2001 7:44 pm
Thanked: 283 times in 109 posts

Re: Cascades Better than the Sierra?

by mvs » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:07 pm

Naw, I just like-a the mountains. A LOT. :D Be sure to make a TR for what you find in there!

User Avatar
Sierra Ledge Rat

 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:14 am
Thanked: 280 times in 182 posts

Re: Cascades Better than the Sierra?

by Sierra Ledge Rat » Sat Aug 13, 2011 1:30 pm

Utterly spectacular photo....
mvs wrote:Image


SKI wrote:For the aspiring alpinist...

The Sierras don't offer enough.

In the Cascades, you can get into all sorts of trouble/fun. Mixed, hard rock, easy rock, Ice, Tons of Alpine Ice....


True. Which is why I prefer the High Sierra. Climbing in the Cascades can be pretty painful at times. Logistics, weather, approaches, descents, etc.

The High Sierra is for alpinists who are rock-climbers at heart. The Cascades are for alpinists who are ice climbers at heart.

Previous

Return to Ethics, Spray, and Slander

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests