Interesting article on Snow Creek to San Jacinto

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.
User Avatar
Cy Kaicener

 
Posts: 4698
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 pm
Thanked: 386 times in 344 posts

Interesting article on Snow Creek to San Jacinto

by Cy Kaicener » Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:51 pm

I just read an interesting magazine article on the North Face of San Jacinto
http://www.palmspringslife.com/Palm-Spr ... p-Beyond/#

User Avatar
avalanch

 
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 5:36 pm
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post

by avalanch » Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:21 pm

Very Nice...

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7775
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 786 times in 518 posts

by MoapaPk » Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:17 pm

Cool article.

It is interesting that the article implies there is a bushwhack alternative to trespassing; is that for real, or is the alternate route over 5.x rock and through dense manzanita? Do you think volunteers could cut a trail through the brush?

The USFS is often not happy with people cutting trails. There is a route up the S side of Charleston Peak, NV, and the trail-less path gains about 5200', mainly through a narrow canyon. Since there is a perennial stream in the canyon, the brush is nearly impenetrable. A local fellow gathered up some volunteers to make a single, defined trail by cutting brush and cairning the route for the first 1.5 miles. Currently there are about 5 braided, eroding herdpaths. The USFS got wind of the plans, and forbade him to cut brush.

So I guess that if you want to clear a trail on USFS land, keep your plans close to the chest.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4237
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 544 times in 286 posts

by Bob Burd » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 pm

MoapaPk wrote:Cool article.

It is interesting that the article implies there is a bushwhack alternative to trespassing; is that for real, or is the alternate route over 5.x rock and through dense manzanita? Do you think volunteers could cut a trail through the brush?

The USFS is often not happy with people cutting trails. There is a route up the S side of Charleston Peak, NV, and the trail-less path gains about 5200', mainly through a narrow canyon. Since there is a perennial stream in the canyon, the brush is nearly impenetrable. A local fellow gathered up some volunteers to make a single, defined trail by cutting brush and cairning the route for the first 1.5 miles. Currently there are about 5 braided, eroding herdpaths. The USFS got wind of the plans, and forbade him to cut brush.

So I guess that if you want to clear a trail on USFS land, keep your plans close to the chest.


When I was there last Spring with Miguel (I know, who <i>wasn't</i>), we came across an older feller camped just below the snow tongue. Forgot his name, but he'd been working on the all-legal bushwhack route, cuttin' and trimmin' things into shape. The only problem as I recall is it involves some extra miles and a 2,000-foot descent. Which makes most of us want to still take our chances with DWA guard.

(btw, the article can't be any good if they refer to "Mt. Denali")

User Avatar
Day Hiker

 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:57 am
Thanked: 61 times in 43 posts

by Day Hiker » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:54 pm

LOL -- Mt. Denali.

Denali has two big, distinct summits, so if you go there, you're going to the Denalis.

(Sierras?)

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7775
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 786 times in 518 posts

by MoapaPk » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:21 pm

Bob Burd wrote: The only problem as I recall is it involves some extra miles and a 2,000-foot descent.


Seems to me that selective use of high explosives might allow a better alternative route; it might even fit in with the MYLF plans.

User Avatar
ChugachMan

 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:32 am
Thanked: 2 times in 2 posts

Water Authority

by ChugachMan » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:26 pm

I didn't know of the alternate route... maybe that's the way to go. The water authority wouldn't even grant access to RMRU to hike up to retrieve rescue gear, that's how anal they are.


Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests