Most dangerous mountain?

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
User Avatar
Alpinisto

 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:39 am
Thanked: 5 times in 4 posts

by Alpinisto » Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:27 pm

Corax wrote:Death ratios.
I have difficulties to see any peak beat Kawakorpo/Kawagebo, 6740 meters, Meili Xue Shan, Yunnan, China.
19 killed, no one on the summit yet.


Yowza! :shock:

User Avatar
CClaude

 
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:37 am
Thanked: 72 times in 42 posts

by CClaude » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:16 pm

Corax wrote:Death ratios.
I have difficulties to see any peak beat Kawakorpo/Kawagebo, 6740 meters, Meili Xue Shan, Yunnan, China.
19 killed, no one on the summit yet.

Image

North Face of Devils Thumb is coming close though.

User Avatar
Cy Kaicener

 
Posts: 4940
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:59 pm
Thanked: 394 times in 351 posts

Most dangerous mountain

by Cy Kaicener » Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:25 pm

The Choktoi Glacier has a 0% success rate on the north side of the Latok group
http://colinhaley.blogspot.com/2009/07/ ... oktoi.html
Oscar Perez of Spain died there while a large rescue group could not succeed in rescuing him. (Thread recently posted in the News forum)

User Avatar
Hotoven

 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:06 pm
Thanked: 118 times in 89 posts

by Hotoven » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:28 pm

goldenhopper wrote:Beautiful, mysterious and death defying; Mt. Woman is the landslide victor! :wink:


Ahh, speaking from experience I see... :D

User Avatar
Andinistaloco

 
Posts: 6331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:32 am
Thanked: 69 times in 43 posts

by Andinistaloco » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:38 pm

Corax wrote:Death ratios.
I have difficulties to see any peak beat Kawakorpo/Kawagebo, 6740 meters, Yunnan, China.
19 killed, no one on the summit yet.



Agreed. The mountain that kills the most people is most likely not truly the most dangerous one - just the one that the greatest number of people attempt. A truly dangerous mountain, like this one... most folks aren't even willing to set foot on it.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7779
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

by MoapaPk » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:50 pm

No good records for Santorini.

User Avatar
Luciano136

 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:46 pm
Thanked: 10 times in 9 posts

by Luciano136 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:53 pm

Arenal in Costa Rica seems pretty dangerous :)

User Avatar
CClaude

 
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:37 am
Thanked: 72 times in 42 posts

by CClaude » Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:22 pm

Dingus Milktoast wrote:
CClaude wrote:
Corax wrote:Death ratios.
I have difficulties to see any peak beat Kawakorpo/Kawagebo, 6740 meters, Meili Xue Shan, Yunnan, China.
19 killed, no one on the summit yet.

Image

North Face of Devils Thumb is coming close though.


Devils Thumb was climbed in the 1940s by Fritz Weissner, using hemp ropes, yes?

DMT


Not by the north face. The north facee has killed or scared the living crap out of everyone attempting it. The last two deaths were pretty recent

User Avatar
Klenke

 
Posts: 930
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 4:14 pm
Thanked: 17 times in 13 posts

by Klenke » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:29 pm

I think for percentage deaths for peaks, it is useful to set a cut-off lower limit for the total number of attempts (by party or individual).

Clearly, a peak attempted once where everyone died--even if 25 people--due to an accident can't be fairly compared to a peak attempted 1000 times with a 45% death rate.

What's a useful cut-off, though? Maybe a minimum of 10 attempts in the Himalaya and 100 attempts in more accessible regions (North America, etc.).

User Avatar
Luciano136

 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:46 pm
Thanked: 10 times in 9 posts

by Luciano136 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:18 pm

A percentage is probably the most well accepted way to measure it I'd say. If you have 10 different attempts and 7 die, it must be pretty dangerous :)

User Avatar
Baarb

 
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:42 pm
Thanked: 43 times in 30 posts

by Baarb » Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:53 pm

Anyone else find the enthusiasm this thread has drawn a bit odd? I mean we are talking about people getting killed here.

User Avatar
Luciano136

 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:46 pm
Thanked: 10 times in 9 posts

by Luciano136 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:31 pm

Baarb wrote:Anyone else find the enthusiasm this thread has drawn a bit odd? I mean we are talking about people getting killed here.


I think it's more the fascination with danger that's intriguing rather than people dying.

PreviousNext

Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests