A blast! New avalanche control technology

Post general questions and discuss issues related to climbing.
User Avatar
Diggler

 
Posts: 2796
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 1:03 pm
Thanked: 11 times in 10 posts

A blast! New avalanche control technology

by Diggler » Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 pm

http://tas.groupemnd.com/en/gazex/gazex.html

Click on the 'videos' link to see it in action. Cool!

User Avatar
MarthaP

 
Posts: 1300
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 1:13 pm
Thanked: 4 times in 1 post

by MarthaP » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:35 am

I know some folks that, with a couple of bean burritos and a sixer, could accomplish the same thing for a LOT less money. :lol:

Fire in the hole!!!

User Avatar
Diggler

 
Posts: 2796
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 1:03 pm
Thanked: 11 times in 10 posts

by Diggler » Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:26 am

MarthaP wrote:I know some folks that, with a couple of bean burritos and a sixer, could accomplish the same thing for a LOT less money. :lol:

Fire in the hole!!!


:lol: :lol:

User Avatar
PellucidWombat

 
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 6:50 pm
Thanked: 48 times in 34 posts

by PellucidWombat » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:47 am

seems a tad intrusive, visually, although I wonder if it is better in terms of pollution?

User Avatar
nattfodd

 
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:11 am
Thanked: 10 times in 5 posts

by nattfodd » Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:52 am

Same reaction here, it looks awfully ugly and intrusive.

User Avatar
Hotoven

 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 8:06 pm
Thanked: 118 times in 89 posts

by Hotoven » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:21 pm

It does look ugly, but I think its a good idea for highly populated areas where inexperienced people may become victimized of avalanches very easily.

User Avatar
Diggler

 
Posts: 2796
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2001 1:03 pm
Thanked: 11 times in 10 posts

by Diggler » Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:09 pm

Dingus Milktoast wrote:You're thread title says new but the web site says since 1988. A decent I do frequently on Red Lake Peak passes right next to one of these things (right over the highway). That thing has been there for 10 years at least?

DMT


Perhaps it's just my ignorance, but it's my impression that this technology (& technology in general) takes awhile to overtake the previous way of doing things. I just discovered it after finding out that this system is going to be installed near Lee Vining, where it was not used before. Regardless of how 'new' it is, I'd guess that many people who frequent areas where this would be employed are/were unaware of it.

User Avatar
John Duffield

 
Posts: 2458
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:48 pm
Thanked: 2280 times in 1241 posts

by John Duffield » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:29 pm

So here's a place that looks like a likely candidate for installation

Image

no avatar
mconnell

 
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2001 4:28 pm
Thanked: 337 times in 200 posts

by mconnell » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:39 pm

John Duffield wrote:So here's a place that looks like a likely candidate for installation



Ruin your whole day if you skied under that at the wrong time.

User Avatar
PellucidWombat

 
Posts: 1140
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 6:50 pm
Thanked: 48 times in 34 posts

by PellucidWombat » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:25 pm

fku wrote:Already installed


Ewwwwww. I'd throw a fit if I ever saw those things in the Wasatch.

I wonder what is worse?: the visual pollution of these devices, or the cons of using explosives and howitzer shells, which leave less visible traces but still litter the slopes and possibly add to water pollution.

Perhaps a better (albeit more expensive solution) is to just build more avalanche sheds over roadways (although they are HELL to cycle through). Buildings can be constructed to deflect and resist the flows of avalanches as well, it just isn't cheap.


Return to General

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests