Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

Regional discussion and conditions reports for the Golden State. Please post partners requests and trip plans in the California Climbing Partners forum.
User Avatar
TheGeneral

 
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:50 am
Thanked: 629 times in 423 posts

Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by TheGeneral » Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:50 am

Horse packing in Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks is on hold because a San Francisco judge says the parks are violating the federal Wilderness Act.

The issue percolated for years before exploding last month, leaving packers one chance in May to forestall a ban that many say will cripple their industry.

Wednesday, Rep. Devin Nunes stoked the fire by blaming the Obama administration for caving to environmentalists and not pushing for a compromise.

Sequoia & Kings Canyon Superintendent Karen Taylor-Goodrich wrote in a March 12 letter to 16 pack stations that no permits would be issued until the matter is resolved in federal court.

More than two dozen other businesses that operate within the park are also affected. These include back-country trips booked through REI, Outward Bound or any other commercial guide services.


http://www.fresnobee.com/2012/04/04/278 ... ng-on.html
"I would make this war as severe as possible, and show no symptoms of tiring till the South begs for mercy." -- William Tecumseh Sherman

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by Bob Burd » Mon Apr 09, 2012 1:05 am

That's one industry I would like to see retired.

The following user would like to thank Bob Burd for this post
GreenMountainBoy, JasonH

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by lcarreau » Mon Apr 09, 2012 1:18 am

Last week, I was riding my mountain bike on a trail that horses had been on. Takes some fancy maneuvers to avoid running into ... "fresh animal excreta !"

Could be a messy case ..

And ... not sure if Teddy would approve ..

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by lcarreau » Mon Apr 09, 2012 1:38 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4R9FiKE0Tk[/youtube]
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
ScottHanson

 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:28 pm
Thanked: 22 times in 12 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by ScottHanson » Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:28 pm

There is room for all of us in the National Parks. I have seen older folks (maybe in their mid 70's or more) on horseback in the Sierra. If not for horses some of them could not enjoy fishing at a backcountry lake. I also think there needs to be some accommodation for paralyzed and other physically challenged folks to enjoy our National Parks. On the other hand there are athletic folks (speed backpackers, speed hikers, and speed climbers) who seek the challenges to reach remote areas of our National Parks in addition to enjoying the peaceful natural setting and incredible scenic vistas. Hopefully a balance can be achieved between all groups; where the natural resource can be enjoyed and protected.

User Avatar
ExcitableBoy

 
Posts: 3666
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:33 am
Thanked: 663 times in 496 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by ExcitableBoy » Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:24 pm

Edward Abbey argued that no accomodations should be made for old folks in the wilderness. If they didn't get off their asses to see it when they had the chance, too bad. Not saying I agree with this.

User Avatar
Bob Burd
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2001 10:42 pm
Thanked: 572 times in 296 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by Bob Burd » Mon Apr 09, 2012 11:59 pm

HandjamMasterC wrote:If there is no commercial horse packing, there should be no use of horses for trail work or anything else. Let the John Muir Trail deteriorate back to wilderness.


I'd be good with this. Look at the old trails that don't get used by packers and see how much trail work they need - much, much less. Good to see you back HJMC.

User Avatar
labgloves

 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:05 pm
Thanked: 10 times in 9 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by labgloves » Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:33 am

Bob - You might be correct with respect to horseless-trails needing a little less work due to a lower rate of erosion. However, I think you are underestimating the amount of yearly work done mostly by horse teams clearing downed trees etc . . .

I don't enjoy coming across a horse train on a dusty trail either . . . but for this reason, those mentioned by ScottHanson, and a few others, I find horses a complicated issue.

User Avatar
MoapaPk

 
Posts: 7780
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 7:42 pm
Thanked: 787 times in 519 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by MoapaPk » Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:39 am

If we let them ban horses, then sooner of later they will ban pack ferrets. What will be next?
Image

User Avatar
lcarreau

 
Posts: 4226
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:27 pm
Thanked: 1898 times in 1415 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by lcarreau » Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:41 am

MoapaPk wrote: What will be next?


EASY ... the next ban will be bears won't be able to CHILL OUT on picnic tables ..

Image
"Turkey Vultures always vomit when they get nervous."

User Avatar
Princess Buttercup

 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:13 pm
Thanked: 456 times in 245 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by Princess Buttercup » Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:49 am

Bob Burd wrote:
HandjamMasterC wrote:If there is no commercial horse packing, there should be no use of horses for trail work or anything else. Let the John Muir Trail deteriorate back to wilderness.


I'd be good with this. Look at the old trails that don't get used by packers and see how much trail work they need - much, much less. Good to see you back HJMC.


You haven't been up Sawmill yet. :twisted:

User Avatar
sierraman

 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:40 am
Thanked: 42 times in 31 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by sierraman » Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:12 am

Last September I hired Clyde Pack Outfitters to pack us in from Wishon to Tehipite Valley and then up the Middle Fork of the Kings River to the JMT. If such a trip has been done before it was decades ago. The NPS sent over a trail crew guy to help us clear downed trees from the trail. It took three days of hard work to make the one way trip. Whoever may pass that way in the future will be the beneficiary of our efforts. None of that would have been possible without the pack horses. Admittedly there are impacts resulting from 1,200 lb hoofed animals in an alpine environment, however taking all factors into consideration I would oppose an across the board ban on pack stock.

User Avatar
thegib

 
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:18 pm
Thanked: 27 times in 21 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by thegib » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:39 am

I think this is great news! The dust, stink, and poop, the trampled terrain, the giant fire-pits and grills and nails in the trees, the wear and tear on the trails - long may it stay banned! There may be legitimate uses of stock in the high wilderness, but that wasn't what the lawsuit was about.
- A proud supporter of High Sierra Hikers Assoc.

User Avatar
mattyj

 
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:21 am
Thanked: 63 times in 33 posts

Re: Horse Packers Banned in SEKI

by mattyj » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:55 am

Just to be clear, as far as I can tell this only applies to commercial pack concessions operating inside the park, correct? My dog and mountain bike have to stay at home, but you're still free to bring a grass-mowing a poop machine along so long as you're not paying someone to guide you in?

There's a huge difference between banning horses and not handing out a concession permit to run a business inside the park. That said, I'd be totally happy to see the decision reversed if horse poop had to be buried in a 6" cathole rather than strewn across the trail.

The following user would like to thank mattyj for this post
Bob Sihler, lcarreau, musicman82

Next

Return to California

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests