by Marmaduke » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:12 am
by Marmaduke » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:37 am
by Vitaliy M. » Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:20 pm
I think the big difference is that there is no money involving in hiking, mountaineering or trad climbing.
maybe I should be stripped of a handful of state highpoints as being Diamox-aided.
by sharperblue » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:27 pm
by Vitaliy M. » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:16 pm
by sharperblue » Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:28 am
butitsadryheat wrote:sharperblue wrote:The whole concept - in climbing or anything else - is a slippery slope: does caffeine count? it's an amphetamine.
While both caffeine and meth are both stimulants, caffeine is NOT an amphetamine.
by lcarreau » Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:30 am
sharperblue wrote:
that's true - stimulant - i stand corrected.
by lcarreau » Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:20 am
by Andrew Rankine » Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:54 am
borutbk wrote:Luckily (?), climbing, alpinism is not a sport. If it was, it would matter.
Hermann Buhl already describes (with satisfaction) his use of amphs (Nanga Parbat). But I'm quite sure most climbs nowadays are clean. Drugs are lighter weight than alcohol, and I guess that is a factor.
by Ben Beckerich » Sat Aug 25, 2012 6:22 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests