MoapaPk wrote: The surest way to a heart attack is to let that stuff eat at you.

+ 1

To Paulo: ..... hehehe ...

You can't let "one man's opinion" get to you! Gotta keep going, man, gotta keep going .. the road will always have THORNS, as well as ROSES.

Reminds me of myself .... when THEY get critical ... gotta take the GOOD with the BAD .... and I do mean bad, just like that "M.J." dude ......

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6-vb4_3LlI[/youtube]

YO PAROFES ......

You gotta be tough ..... when the going gets tough, the tough go SHOPPING ..... just ask Czech Superstar Lucie Bila ....... .........

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VspL1YpruZo[/youtube]

Paulo, I've enjoyed your pages, (TR, mountain pages, articles, photos etc.), you do nice work and you put your heart into it and that shows. Don't pay attention to those who are obviously trying to get under your skin, their comments are meaningless. Also be weary of these SPers:


Some are obvious and some less but when they show their true colors, pay them not attention either.
Keep up your fine work.

My stating what is possible, does not mean I recommend that possibility.

However, there have been TRs where a few of the banned folks came in under new avatars, and made overly nasty comments. I recall one case where the comments left the author stunned, and she contemplated removing a carefully drafted article. There is a fine line; sometimes one can see that the comments are a false front for retaliation, maybe more to SP as a whole, than to the individual author. Sometimes nasty comments just leave the commenter looking stupid, as you've pointed out, and leaving the comments up is the most fitting "revenge."

Paulo .... have you ever thought of consulting THIS MAN ....

He's already helped MILLIONS of Americans get their lives together after they suffered from some IDIOT'S verbal abuse ...

No but Mitt Romney's dog went number two.

Don't let em get you down Paulo. I've had many nasty things posted on my content in my younger years. But I knew that at least half the people liked my posts, even if a few people liked my post that was enough for me. So in this case you have the eyes of summitpost able to see your article on the frontpage which according to the votes everyone is voting nicely (not saying votes say everything about who likes what). My point is that even if there was a dozen people who didn't like your article, the hundred or more who do like your content would be sad for you to remove it. So don't let a rotten apple ruin a tree of beautiful fruit.

mrchad9 wrote:No but Mitt Romney's dog went number two.

Sarah Palin's cat didn't even participate .... she was too busty .... I mean too busy rolling in the dough !