by clmbr » Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:38 pm
by Bob Burd » Sun Aug 26, 2012 7:20 pm
by MoapaPk » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:07 pm
by Bubba Suess » Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:21 pm
MoapaPk wrote:I'm guessing that Bubba took over that page when the original owner left or went missing. That doesn't look like his kind of route.
by mrchad9 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:02 pm
by Bubba Suess » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:33 pm
mrchad9 wrote:I would love to take it Bubba. Did the route last weekend as it turns out, and it was fantastic...
by mrchad9 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:31 pm
Bubba Suess wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I would love to take it Bubba. Did the route last weekend as it turns out, and it was fantastic...
Its yours. Have fun with it. I know you will do a great job on it. I think some of the other routes need to be beefed up too...
by Bubba Suess » Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:57 pm
mrchad9 wrote:And the Mount Shasta page itself is superb!
by Burchey » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:56 pm
mrchad9 wrote:Bubba Suess wrote:mrchad9 wrote:I would love to take it Bubba. Did the route last weekend as it turns out, and it was fantastic...
Its yours. Have fun with it. I know you will do a great job on it. I think some of the other routes need to be beefed up too...
Thanks Bubba! I've been wanting something I felt a bit more passionate about rather than a radom peak. Now I have it!
Yeah... Shasta is such a fantastic mountain, but I have been very disappointed with the quality of most of the route pages. It's the kind of peak where folks should be able to do a great job on the routes with a little effort, and there are a lot of people that would find them useful. There are a couple good pages, but not most. I see you just got around some of that issue with a great page on North Gate.
And the Mount Shasta page itself is superb!
by MoapaPk » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:01 pm
Burchey wrote:Do you think the relative difficulty of creating Trip Reports/Pages/etc with the current software discourages users from adding? It's fairly time consuming - images especially
by mrchad9 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:30 pm
Burchey wrote:Do you think the relative difficulty of creating Trip Reports/Pages/etc with the current software discourages users from adding? It's fairly time consuming - images especially
by clmbr » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:17 pm
mrchad9 wrote:I would love to take it Bubba. Did the route last weekend as it turns out, and it was fantastic...
by mrchad9 » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:30 pm
by clmbr » Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:58 pm
mrchad9 wrote:. . . Long weekend coming up and I have a short week next week, so it'll be a couple weeks before significant progress is made.
by Bob Sihler » Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:33 pm
mrchad9 wrote:Burchey wrote:Do you think the relative difficulty of creating Trip Reports/Pages/etc with the current software discourages users from adding? It's fairly time consuming - images especially
The difficulty of using the current software is an obstacle for many users... several have commented on it in the past.
For me the greater factor is the amount of time and energy it takes to create the writeup and content for the page. I have become more reluctant to put as much effort into low rewarding endeavors (such as creating peak pages for seldom climbed locations- I am more interested in those that have more public interest).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests