Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy...

Suggestions and comments about SummitPost's features, policies, and procedures. Post bugs here.
User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 88 times in 58 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by visentin » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:02 am

Montana Matt wrote:Uservoice is NOT for submitting bugs. Do that on the forums here. Submit and vote for ideas on uservoice so that you have your say in what happens next to SP.

OK, this is clear now...
However the forum title should include perhaps a link to uservoice.

Montana Matt wrote:
mrchad9 wrote:I would be disappointed if votes determined the best ideas and which would be implemented. I think the tool is great, btw, but it should be just one of several datapoints and considerations.

Agreed. It's good to get an idea of what is most desired by the SP membership, I think. But it doesn't necessarily control what is going to happen next. Once we have an idea of what is most desired, we can make decisions based on that data, along with other data (such as time to complete the task, reward vs. time spent, etc.).
No one ever said that whatever gets voted highest is going to get implemented next :)
I think that's why there are different tags that can be assigned to ideas, such as "Under Review", "Planned", or "Started".


There is something important beyond the amount of votes that certainly determines what's next for Matt: the complexity of requested improvements :D

User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 88 times in 58 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by visentin » Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:59 pm

basing on your email address they get in touch with the Polish police and they come to your home :D

User Avatar
Fred Spicker

 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 5:47 am
Thanked: 59 times in 37 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by Fred Spicker » Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:54 pm

Why the hell should I have to set up another account at something called gravatar in order to have input at SP? What a bunch of shit.

User Avatar
mrchad9

 
Posts: 4545
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:01 am
Thanked: 1338 times in 911 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by mrchad9 » Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:14 pm

I think it will work if you give a fake email account. You just won't be able to get updates on changes to your suggestion.

If worried about it, give them a different email.

User Avatar
Josh Lewis

 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:12 pm
Thanked: 1111 times in 679 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by Josh Lewis » Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:14 pm

Gravatar is for the avatar image. I personally have one, but it's certainly not needed. :wink:

User Avatar
visentin

 
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:27 pm
Thanked: 88 times in 58 posts

Re: Application lifecycle management for SP ? Let's be crazy

by visentin » Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:24 pm

Montana Matt wrote:Why all the fuss about providing an email address to vote? If you don't want to do it, you don't have to.


Matt, you have my total support. There is always hundred times more people to spit on everything than people who set things up.

Previous

Return to Site Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests