by yatsek » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:35 pm
by rgg » Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:32 pm
by Josh Lewis » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:59 pm
by yatsek » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:34 pm
rgg wrote:... does your new 8, 9 and 10 still mean the same to you as your old ones? (If this makes you feel inclined to check all your old votes, good luck on finding them all.)
by yatsek » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:38 pm
Josh Lewis wrote:Problem is that I've voted some 8/10s on some bad but not terrible pages.
Josh Lewis wrote:Cutting the old votes in half would be a better way to go (except for 10s).
by Josh Lewis » Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:44 am
yatsek wrote:Hmm, how about dividing them by 3?
by lcarreau » Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:56 am
Josh Lewis wrote: When I say majority, I mean more folks for it then opposed rather than everyone on SP.
by Josh Lewis » Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:03 am
lcarreau wrote:I'm sorry, WHAT EXACTLY is wrong with Bob Smith's page?
by lcarreau » Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:59 am
Josh Lewis wrote:lcarreau wrote:I'm sorry, WHAT EXACTLY is wrong with Bob Smith's page?
Yatsek was referring to the fact that some folks who down voted the article did it on the bases of the old voting system. For example if someone didn't like the article but at the same time didn't hate it they would vote a 7/10 or a 8/10. Now those are good votes hence making it appear as if they support it. That article is just an example, there are many pages here on SP that people "down voted" but with the new system it is now positive.
As for my answer to Larry's question, putting aside my dislike of how the article was presented I'll say what's wrong with the page. Bob trashed talked people. He did not treat me very well. Had he been more respectful that would have been a different story.
Sarah Simon wrote:Bob: Has someone hacked your account? I've always known you to be friendly, courteous and ELOQUENT in your discourse. The tone of your comments do not reflect well on you and seem far out of character for a member I like and respect.
Sarah
by yatsek » Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:37 pm
Josh Lewis wrote:As for my answer to Larry's question, putting aside my dislike of how the article was presented I'll say what's wrong with the page. Bob trashed talked people. He did not treat me very well. Had he been more respectful that would have been a different story.
by lcarreau » Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:08 am
by Josh Lewis » Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:00 am
lcarreau wrote:Gotta keep in mind that Sarah might have a valid POINT, Josh man ...
by mrchad9 » Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:13 am
Ambivalent
Voted 5/10
I respect your right to climb this rock, but not to flaunt treading on the sensitivities of others. Great climb nonetheless. 5/10, can't have it both ways.
Posted Dec 6, 2010 12:59 am
by yatsek » Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:04 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests