Fletch wrote:I didn't forget about you Tan!Tanngrisnir3 wrote:Anything else irrelevant you'd like to throw in there?
Excellent. Do let's remain relevant in the future then, hmmm?
Tanngrisnir3 wrote:Your OP doesn't convey your above statement whatsoever.
Yes it does.
No, it doesn't.
Tanngrisnir3 wrote:Do you even bother to read what you post?
Most of the time. Is it over your head?
No, what it is is clearly evident that you don't actually appreciate what you were initially asking. The details of the case that led to the outcome are relevant, despite your protestations to the contrary, because they would have to be substantially similar for this to hold up in the future as some sort of case law that would apply to climbing/hiking guides.