by rpc » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:22 pm
by mvs » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:06 pm
by MoapaPk » Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:52 pm
by rpc » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:26 pm
MoapaPk wrote:This last go-round, I uploaded a few full-sized pics, and my sense of parsimony is overwhelming me.
by mvs » Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:41 pm
MoapaPk wrote:I used to pre-size my images to ~1024x768; bigger for panos. Full-size images for digital cameras are usually too big for most computer screens.
This last go-round, I uploaded a few full-sized pics, and my sense of parsimony is overwhelming me.
But regardless of the size in bytes, people can still swamp with numbers of items. It's a thorny issue. The site masters could limit the number of photos uploaded, when not uploaded by page authors. It's rare for a person to be able to contribute more than a handful of pictures with new content, to an existing mountain page. But then people might start creating albums or custom objects just as storage.
by Gangolf Haub » Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:58 am
by mvs » Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:05 am
by mvs » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:59 pm
visentin wrote:Congratulations !
I used it to upload a dozen of pictures of Rozsutec, it works very fine.
Few remarks/suggestions (despite I don't really know if I use the latest version)
by mvs » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:29 pm
by mvs » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:36 pm
by mvs » Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:52 am
by mvs » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:29 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests