asmrz wrote:His 7 Summits were done on Top Rope...
No. Not true.
When Bass climbed Everest he was roped to Breashears like a traditional rope team. They had no fixed ropes on the scary final summit ridge. He was also on 2l/m O2 where most of his latter-day followers are now on 4l/m, with their personal Sherpas carrying more. When he attempted the north face, he climbed higher and did more work on it than many 'real climbers' have managed. He was much less guided than guided clients are now. He might have been a ridiculed anomaly at the time, in the early 80s, but compared to guided clients now he was playing a different game.
What pissed off a lot of 'real climbers' was that Bass was actually pretty strong on mountains, stronger than some of them, but had almost no learned skill or built-up experience. This has been told to me by people who were there at the time. The 'real climbers' realised with a bit more time and re-directed effort he could have surpassed them - and still been a successful businessman, rich and comfortable, while they were living in their vans. He made them look bad.
Bass & Wells' 1983 expedition to Vinson helped open up the continent to non-government visitors and enabled previously impossible adventures for thousands, many of them hard core 'real' adventurers, not just guided clients. He put his money where his mouth was, in a big way - something most don't do. On that trip he was not guided in any way resembling guiding now - it was a remote, cold, serious place and he was there with almost no backup, SAR, fixed ropes or route beta.
Most guided clients to Vinson now would fail on the mountain doing it how he did it.Bass started something that has had many negative impacts on the world of climbing, but most of those came well after him and can only
very indirectly be attributed to him.
Whatever he was like personally, or did in the rest of his life, the facts of the matter are that in climbing terms he does not deserve the ignorant scorn heaped on him in subsequent years.