SummitPost.org

Well, champ, it is not a secret. It is listed in dozens of registers all over the Sierra, on the SC website (along with at least a half dozen other ladies full names, and many of their home towns, phone numbers, email addresses, and in some cases street addresses). And not sure why you didn't erase the other seven or so folks last names from the photo if you really thought it was an issue.

Information is out there, a photo of a register doesn't change that. There are also 100s of women on this website that use their full names in their IDs, and none have ever been stalked. But perhaps I wouldn't characterize it as being overly cautious, rather providing a completely false sense of caution. It is absolutely a non issue.

And... I don't think that thread was even "controversial". Not in a way that would provoke the kind of activity you are suggesting.

mrchad9 wrote:Well, champ, it is not a secret. It is listed in dozens of registers all over the Sierra, on the SC website (along with at least a half dozen other ladies full names, and many of their home towns, phone numbers, email addresses, and in some cases street addresses). And not sure why you didn't erase the other seven or so folks last names from the photo if you really thought it was an issue.

Information is out there, a photo of a register doesn't change that. There are also 100s of women on this website that use their full names in their IDs, and none have ever been stalked. But perhaps I wouldn't characterize it as being overly cautious, rather providing a completely false sense of caution. It is absolutely a non issue.

And... I don't think that thread was even "controversial". Not in a way that would provoke the kind of activity you are suggesting.

You asked and I answered. That's all. It was never really that big of a deal.