Page 5 of 9

Re: Elitism

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:46 pm
by simonov
McCannster wrote:Know an elitist?


I don't know any personally, which is why I come to SummitPost.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:53 pm
by ksolem
CClaude wrote: And climbing is impressive? I fiugure climbing is a useless activity which doesn't affect anything in the world, except for how it changes peoples lives, and their perception of the world around them.


I fell for climbing because I had the great fortune to see a good climber float a difficult lead in the Gunks. It was my first day at the rocks, and I had not climbed yet. I was totally impressed as the guy transcended from physical achievment into art as he expressed his delight at simply doing it in a way we watchers could percieve and enjoy. I had only seen this done by the best ballet dancers until this moment.

To say that this event changed my life and my perceptions of the world around me is a good way to put it.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:26 pm
by blazin
Blakeman wrote: they then become a Master. Thus, they are an Elitist.


I don't have much to add to this debate, besides this snarky and elitist comment: this thread amazed me with the continued demonstration of an apparently widespread ignorance of the English language. Others have tried making this point, but I enjoy exercises in futility:

Elite - someone who is among the best at a given activity or skill;

Elitist - someone who believes that those with higher competence at a given activity or skill should be treated exceptionally/better than others.

Thus, one need not be elite to be an elitist. One can both know ones place in the pecking order yet be an elitist. In some situations this is hardly a bad thing. In the filed of medicine, I acknowledge I know nothing, but am pretty adamant that the field be led by foremost experts in the area--the medical elite.

I wonder whether elitism is even the right concept for this thread. The OP seems to be much more concerned with those that take pleasure in rubbing others' noses in their supposed superiority. In my experience, these tend to be people who either falsely believe themselves to be elite or are so caught up in external appearances and what others think of them that they go out out of their way to make others think they are elite. In those cases, however, I think the better word is arrogance.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:33 pm
by Day Hiker
blazin wrote:this thread amazed me with the continued demonstration of an apparently widespread ignorance of the English language.

+1 :lol:

blazin wrote:Others have tried making this point, but I enjoy exercises in futility:

Elite - someone who is among the best at a given activity or skill;

Elitist - someone who believes that those with higher competence at a given activity or skill should be treated exceptionally/better than others.

Exactly.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:37 pm
by BeDrinkable
CClaude wrote:And climbing is impressive? I fiugure climbing is a useless activity which doesn't affect anything in the world, except for how it changes peoples lives, and their perception of the world around them.

Maybe, but you can say that about most activities. You pretty much answered your own question. It's all perception. If I find what someone does impressive, then it's impressive (to me). If most people find what someone does impressive, then it's impressive (to society).

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:59 pm
by Day Hiker
MoapaPk wrote:"I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God."

Did anyone else notice the changed meaning? Damn serial-comma omitters. Down with you all!


Still funny in 2010. I love their shows.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:02 pm
by dskoon
FortMental wrote:
Day Hiker wrote:
blazin wrote:this thread amazed me with the continued demonstration of an apparently widespread ignorance of the English language.

+1 :lol:

blazin wrote:Others have tried making this point, but I enjoy exercises in futility:

Elite - someone who is among the best at a given activity or skill;

Elitist - someone who believes that those with higher competence at a given activity or skill should be treated exceptionally/better than others.

Exactly.


+ Eleventy Billion


[b]+ Another Ninety! [/b]

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:05 pm
by TheOrglingLlama

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:18 pm
by Day Hiker


Haha! Just one of the many hilarious, super-classic lines from that movie:

Noonan: "I planned to go to law school after I graduated, but, uh, looks like my folks won't have enough money to put me through college."

Smails: "Well, the world needs ditch diggers too."


:lol:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:33 pm
by drjohnso1182
A semantics argument on Summitpost!? Inconceivable!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:47 pm
by TheOrglingLlama
Inconceivable!


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means :mrgreen:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D58LpHBnvsI

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:53 pm
by MoapaPk
drjohnso1182 wrote:A semantics argument on Summitpost!?


Isn't that the study of Jewish people? What do they have to do with this argument?


PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:57 pm
by drjohnso1182
+1's for all. I knew you guys wouldn't let me down

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:41 pm
by Marmaduke
I think the definition of an elitist is someone who has more than 5 posts with 5 opinions on this one topic.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 3:08 pm
by MoapaPk
Sierras.