climbncookie wrote:I just finished watching it and loved it. I think they hit a great balance, which is very tough to achieve.
However; I agree with Seano:
seano wrote:nhluhr wrote:So what, in your opinion, was "too far" in terms of twisting historical facts?
For me, Fraulein Mandatory Love Interest wandering out onto the face with a flashlight, spending the night there, and being alive in the morning, was one step too far. The truth was dramatic enough.
They did cross the line at the end, but I'm glad they didn't do a huge flashback at the beginning to show previous a previous relationship etc. instead. I think it hit a solid balance.
The story of Kurz, Hinterstoisser, will always be a wonder, such a tragic set of circumstances.
Yep, her wandering out there was a bit much. . . But, overall, I thought they did the "love-relationship," thing, pretty decently. They could have flashbacked, as mentioned, and really gone over the top with the whole thing. But, twas present but sublte, not to mention her staying "pure" for her true love, rather than succumbing to her slimy, self-interested boss; ie. she didn't sleep with the guy, and when he was ready to abandon the project and head back to the city, she stayed.
Not to mention a great film that captured well the climbing of the day, and the essence of climbing something so formidable. I loved the part where Kurz pops his head out of the tent to view the clearing night sky, wakes his partner, and says "it's time." Yahoo!