Re: Will Everest ever be priced adequately - not getting you
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 3:55 pm
We've wrecked the thing when it's expensive......I'd hate to see the madness when it's affordable. A
Climbing, hiking, mountaineering forum
https://www.summitpost.org/phpBB3/
radson wrote:johngenx wrote:I'll preface my remarks by being clear that I have no desire to climb Everest. I see the clusterfuck of climbers lined up on fixed ropes, going hypothermic at bottle-necks and that in itself is enough to turn me off.
That said, were I set on Everest, I'd start on Denali to get some 6000M time and experience working in the cold. Then maybe Aconcagua for some 7000M work. I'd do both of these self-supported, carrying my gear, being self sufficient, and making decisions at altitude.
Then heading to Everest, I'd go with one the opinion of one of the previous posters and eschew bottled O2, Sherpa assist, and so on. I'd do a "Steck" and try to head up ahead of the Sherpas at the start of the season and lead it myself.
To me, it's the difference between "climbing" Everest and "summitting" Everest. I would want to do the former.
Comedy gold. All the best climbing decisions and plans are made in the comfort of ones home on the internet
fatdad wrote:Did Goran Kropp use oxygen? Curious, because if he didn't then he pretty much rode his bike to the base and started climbing. Not that many of us have the ability to emulate his style, but it is a striking contrast to alternative forms of ascents that people seem to view as non-existent.